Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890267788> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2890267788 endingPage "e182136" @default.
- W2890267788 startingPage "e182136" @default.
- W2890267788 abstract "New US health care payment models have increasingly incentivized health care systems to promote health and reduce health care spending at the population level, with Medicare beneficiaries representing one of the largest populations affected by new payment models. Identifying novel strategies to promote health and reduce health care spending is necessary.To assess whether the overall well-being of a population is associated with health care spending for people 65 years of age or older.This US national, population-based cross-sectional study examined the association between county well-being and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) spending. Population well-being, a holistic assessment of the overall health of the population comprising interrelated domains, including physical, mental, and social health, as measured by the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index (2010), was linked to the mean spending per Medicare FFS beneficiary (2010) and county characteristics data for all US counties assessed. The data were adjusted for prevalence of 4 low-variation conditions (hip fracture, stroke, colorectal cancer, and acute myocardial infarction) and regional penetration of Medicare Advantage. Data analyses were conducted October 13, 2016, to October 31, 2017.Mean spending per Medicare FFS beneficiary per county.In total, 2998 counties were assessed using county-level mean values, with 4 to 7317 participants (mean [SD] number of participants, 755 [1220]) per county. The mean (SD) values of the demographic characteristics of the participants were 50.8% (1.3%) female, 74.9% (16.5%) white, 12.1% (13.0%) black, 4.0% (5.3%) Asian, and 13.7% (14.8%) Hispanic with a mean (SD) of the median county age of 38.2 (4.4) years. Medicare spent a mean (SE) of $992 ($110) less per Medicare FFS beneficiary in counties in the highest quintile of well-being compared with counties in the lowest well-being quintile. This inverse association persisted after accounting for key population characteristics such as median household income and contextual factors such as urbanicity and health care system capacity. Medicare spent a mean (SE) of $1233 ($104) less per Medicare FFS beneficiary in counties with the greatest access to basic needs than in those with the lowest access.In this US national study, the overall well-being of a geographically defined population was inversely associated with its health care spending for people 65 years and older. Identifying this association between well-being and health care spending at the population level may help to lay the foundation for further study to first illuminate the mechanisms underlying the association and to second study interventions aimed at creating greater well-being and lower health care spending at the population level." @default.
- W2890267788 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5001943409 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5004123570 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5011210025 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5016093592 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5030726334 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5047180606 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5078724713 @default.
- W2890267788 creator A5088028306 @default.
- W2890267788 date "2018-09-14" @default.
- W2890267788 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2890267788 title "Association of the Overall Well-being of a Population With Health Care Spending for People 65 Years of Age or Older" @default.
- W2890267788 cites W1000811874 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W1969825015 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W1970008581 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W1999262375 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2008416237 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2013690612 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2017796824 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2020512725 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2021879526 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2023190498 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2028496695 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2042723568 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2055461003 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2069845619 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2071627530 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2079660712 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2080132542 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2089473008 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2091033649 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2097473539 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2098397833 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2101389768 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2105933035 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2110161496 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2111896942 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2112027321 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2113957290 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2117470637 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2118745042 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2129991789 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2139186181 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2139236032 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2142900353 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2150363349 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2153782867 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2153917516 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2157619495 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2158426152 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2158970602 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2164510796 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2164788999 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2168681940 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2169819260 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2209751336 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2290142396 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W2399722151 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W630677131 @default.
- W2890267788 cites W80786367 @default.
- W2890267788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2136" @default.
- W2890267788 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6324481" @default.
- W2890267788 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30646154" @default.
- W2890267788 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2890267788 type Work @default.
- W2890267788 sameAs 2890267788 @default.
- W2890267788 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2890267788 countsByYear W28902677882019 @default.
- W2890267788 countsByYear W28902677882020 @default.
- W2890267788 countsByYear W28902677882021 @default.
- W2890267788 countsByYear W28902677882022 @default.
- W2890267788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5001943409 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5004123570 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5011210025 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5016093592 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5030726334 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5047180606 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5078724713 @default.
- W2890267788 hasAuthorship W2890267788A5088028306 @default.
- W2890267788 hasBestOaLocation W28902677881 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C26869875 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConceptScore W2890267788C10138342 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConceptScore W2890267788C144024400 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConceptScore W2890267788C144133560 @default.
- W2890267788 hasConceptScore W2890267788C149923435 @default.