FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890320131> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890320131 endingPage "362" @default.
• W2890320131 startingPage "352" @default.
• W2890320131 abstract "The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) versus posterior open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLMD) for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.We performed a comprehensive retrieval of related studies in 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library). Randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials reported from January 1990 to December 2017 that compared PELD versus OLMD for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation were acquired. The quality of randomized controlled trials was evaluated by the criteria of the Cochrane Back Review Group, and the quality of cohort studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcome measurements included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of sciatica; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery; the Excellent and Good outcome rate based on Macnab criteria. The secondary outcome measurements included the incidence of complication, residual disk, recurrence, and reoperation; operation time; hospital stay; and time to return to work. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed each study for quality.Nine studies with 1585 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Two were randomized controlled trials and the remaining 7 were retrospective cohort studies. The forest plots showed that no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative VAS score of sciatica, ODI before and after surgery, the Excellent and Good outcome rate, the complication rate, and the incidence of recurrence and reoperation. However, the PELD group had a higher incidence of residual disk or incomplete decompression than did the OLMD group. In addition, no significant difference was detected in the operation time between the 2 groups, but the PELD group was associated with shorter hospital stay and time of return to work.Based on the present meta-analysis, no significant difference existed in VAS and ODI scores between the 2 surgical procedures, and they were also similar in terms of operation time, complication rate, and incidence of recurrence and reoperation, but PELD showed shorter hospital stay and time of return to work. Thus, under the premise of careful manipulation and complete decompression, we consider that PELD is a relatively more minimally invasive technique, which could be an alternative to OLMD." @default.
• W2890320131 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5004038189 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5017225255 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5026196471 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5042874079 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5058003680 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5078710627 @default.
• W2890320131 creator A5091305811 @default.
• W2890320131 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2890320131 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2890320131 title "Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W2890320131 cites W1537972189 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W1780429040 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W1987598277 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W1988292293 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W1995126522 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2002316771 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2006811998 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2020087578 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2021184308 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2033217847 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2033921976 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2048557682 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2056592470 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2059597723 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2060663061 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2070070132 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W207150451 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2079108870 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2092737350 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2110152581 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2131838156 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2147415687 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2220077140 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2416694413 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2419412666 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2537520459 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2581542862 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W2620169931 @default.
• W2890320131 cites W3132431218 @default.
• W2890320131 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236" @default.
• W2890320131 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30205219" @default.
• W2890320131 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890320131 type Work @default.
• W2890320131 sameAs 2890320131 @default.
• W2890320131 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2890320131 countsByYear W28903201312019 @default.
• W2890320131 countsByYear W28903201312020 @default.
• W2890320131 countsByYear W28903201312021 @default.
• W2890320131 countsByYear W28903201312022 @default.
• W2890320131 countsByYear W28903201312023 @default.
• W2890320131 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5004038189 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5017225255 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5026196471 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5042874079 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5058003680 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5078710627 @default.
• W2890320131 hasAuthorship W2890320131A5091305811 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2776698514 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C126322002 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C141071460 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C14184104 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C142724271 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C168563851 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C204787440 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2775998654 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2776008035 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2776478404 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2776698514 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2780813298 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C2780907711 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C44575665 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C71924100 @default.
• W2890320131 hasConceptScore W2890320131C95190672 @default.
• W2890320131 hasLocation W28903201311 @default.
• W2890320131 hasLocation W28903201312 @default.
• W2890320131 hasOpenAccess W2890320131 @default.
• W2890320131 hasPrimaryLocation W28903201311 @default.
• W2890320131 hasRelatedWork W2354943008 @default.
• W2890320131 hasRelatedWork W2379443842 @default.
• W2890320131 hasRelatedWork W2408260035 @default.
• W2890320131 hasRelatedWork W3030200858 @default.

• next