FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890473433> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890473433 abstract "Extradition is important. It serves vital purposes. The centrepiece of UK extradition is the hearing. It plays the operative role in the rendition of accused and convicted persons from the UK to third states. In light of the significance of extradition and the centrality of extradition hearings it is not unreasonable to assume that their nature would be settled. This is not the case. Extradition hearings are multifariously understood. This is largely because various existential questions - what they are, what they do, what rules govern them - arise in different contexts and are answered with reference to distinct law. There are three such contexts. They are disputes over the applicable procedural and evidential rules, uncertainty as to their designation for the purposes of appeal and debates concerning the applicability of the right to a fair trial to them. Each of these contexts is framed by a body of rules. These obviously include the Extradition Act 2003 (2003 Act), the core piece of UK extradition law. Also relevant, however, is the law specific to each - procedural and evidential rules, provision governing appeals from the High Court of Justiciary to the Supreme Court and human rights law. Whilst extradition hearings are variously understood across the UK the issue has a particular Scottish resonance. This is due to the unique rules of criminal procedure and evidence and terms of the devolution settlement. Two of the three contexts, therefore, have a distinctly Scottish aspect. This article firstly argues that the variation in conception of extradition hearings is explained by the fact that the same broad question of what extradition hearings are arises in three contexts where distinct law is relied upon to provide the answer. It suggests that an analysis and synthesis of these views leads to a single understanding of extradition hearings as sui generis quasi-criminal proceedings affected by international considerations. Secondly, it is argued that the acceptance of this conceptualisation matters. In addition to facilitating comprehension, a single understanding of extradition hearings can be a platform from which the law can develop in a manner based upon clear and agreed foundations. With extradition hearings singly and positively understood, the law governing and affecting them can evolve in a more coherent and defensible way. This article supports the adoption of such a conceptualisation." @default.
• W2890473433 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890473433 creator A5065747623 @default.
• W2890473433 date "2018-12-31" @default.
• W2890473433 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2890473433 title "What an extradition hearing is and why it matters." @default.
• W2890473433 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890473433 type Work @default.
• W2890473433 sameAs 2890473433 @default.
• W2890473433 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2890473433 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890473433 hasAuthorship W2890473433A5065747623 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C159926677 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C2778063847 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C144024400 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C159926677 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C17319257 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C17744445 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C185592680 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C199539241 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C2778063847 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C2778272461 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C2778449503 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C55493867 @default.
• W2890473433 hasConceptScore W2890473433C98184364 @default.
• W2890473433 hasLocation W28904734331 @default.
• W2890473433 hasOpenAccess W2890473433 @default.
• W2890473433 hasPrimaryLocation W28904734331 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W13029898 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W1415693192 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W1522554452 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W1532463639 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W1544908534 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W1577008474 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W2153461712 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W2300436508 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W2730138896 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W2738662174 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W2973927116 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W3000861645 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W303389399 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W3125225881 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W3170790153 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W3190825690 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W336322089 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W340790274 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W603289076 @default.
• W2890473433 hasRelatedWork W658902578 @default.
• W2890473433 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2890473433 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2890473433 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2890473433 magId "2890473433" @default.
• W2890473433 workType "article" @default.