FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890548769> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890548769 abstract "Introduction The popularity of online physician rating websites has risen substantially. These third-party sites have the potential to significantly influence patients' perception of their healthcare providers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate online ratings of U.S. radiation oncologists (ROs) on Vitals.com, one of the most popular physician rating websites, and the variables that most significantly affect patients' overall rating (OR) of their ROs. Methods The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Physician Comparable Downloadable File was analyzed to obtain data on all self-identified ROs in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Patient Review Satisfaction Scores (PRSS) that ranged from one (poor) to five (excellent) for the following variables were recorded: OR, accurate diagnosis, spending appropriate time with patients, ease of appointment, courteous staff, bedside manner, follow-up after visit, promptness, and wait time. Associations among these factors were assessed. Results Of 4,443 self-identifying Medicare-accepting ROs, 1,797 (40.4%) ROs who had at least one OR rating and at least one written comment were included in this study. The ROs' mean OR was 4.34 ± 0.2 (median 4; 30% received a score of 5; 78% received a score greater than 4). OR was found to have a strong correlation with accuracy of diagnosis (r = 0.69), bedside manner (r = 0.71), and spends appropriate time with patients (r = 0.69). With the exception of the number of ratings (p = 0.07), physicians with over 10 years of experience showed statistically significant differences in how much better they scored in each of the variables compared to those with less than 10 years of experience (p < 0.01 for each characteristic). Significant differences in OR were also observed between ROs whose wait times exceeded 20 minutes compared to those with wait times less than 10 minutes (p < 0.01) for all internal and external metrics except for the number of ratings (p = 0.42) and number of reviews (p = 0.88) Conclusion Patients are providing high ratings for their ROs on Vitals.com and are more frequently recommending them to friends and family. Given the rise in popularity of third-party physician rating sites, it is important for ROs to understand the various factors that may influence their online ratings." @default.
• W2890548769 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5019997274 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5023468026 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5030259365 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5050074450 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5053972619 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5058753923 @default.
• W2890548769 creator A5089089400 @default.
• W2890548769 date "2018-09-17" @default.
• W2890548769 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2890548769 title "How Do Patients Rate Their Radiation Oncologists in the Modern Era: An Analysis of Vitals.com" @default.
• W2890548769 cites W1637125451 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W1894778942 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2022099759 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2033110707 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2034290657 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2050545314 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2053969929 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2054302979 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2081307860 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2125898128 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2145024694 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2208027584 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2214529617 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2461754738 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2553505075 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2564320 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2581495111 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2612122411 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2617436300 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2745498732 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2787538020 @default.
• W2890548769 cites W2887455369 @default.
• W2890548769 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3312" @default.
• W2890548769 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6248776" @default.
• W2890548769 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30473945" @default.
• W2890548769 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890548769 type Work @default.
• W2890548769 sameAs 2890548769 @default.
• W2890548769 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2890548769 countsByYear W28905487692019 @default.
• W2890548769 countsByYear W28905487692022 @default.
• W2890548769 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5019997274 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5023468026 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5030259365 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5050074450 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5053972619 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5058753923 @default.
• W2890548769 hasAuthorship W2890548769A5089089400 @default.
• W2890548769 hasBestOaLocation W28905487691 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C2776534028 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C2780586970 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C126322002 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C138885662 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C15744967 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C160735492 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C162324750 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C2776035688 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C2776534028 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C2780586970 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C41895202 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C50522688 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C512399662 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C71924100 @default.
• W2890548769 hasConceptScore W2890548769C77805123 @default.
• W2890548769 hasLocation W28905487691 @default.
• W2890548769 hasLocation W28905487692 @default.
• W2890548769 hasLocation W28905487693 @default.
• W2890548769 hasOpenAccess W2890548769 @default.
• W2890548769 hasPrimaryLocation W28905487691 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2072869349 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2302096250 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2505596874 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2759952011 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2794326951 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2938015164 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2947618523 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2981966845 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W3012271248 @default.
• W2890548769 hasRelatedWork W2315220426 @default.
• W2890548769 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2890548769 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2890548769 magId "2890548769" @default.
• W2890548769 workType "article" @default.