FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890561114> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890561114 abstract "Abstract Background Upper GI endoscopy and barium swallow are the commonly used diagnostic modalities and Oesophageal manometry of late has contributed to the diagnosis of hiatal hernias. It is known that there exist considerable limitations within each modality in the diagnosis of this seemingly common condition. Aims To assess the correlation between the commonly used investigations of Upper GI Endoscopy and Barium studies and selective use of Esophageal physiology studies in the diagnosis of hiatal hernias. Methods 92 patients who had both an Upper GI endoscopy and Barium swallow in a University hospital formed the study population. There was a subgroup of 29 patients who also underwent a manometry and pH study as a part of their workup. A mix of endoscopists (Physicians, GPs, Surgeons, Supervised trainees and Nurses) performed the upper GI endoscopies. The barium studies were performed by specialist radiographers based on a standard protocol. GI physiology studies were performed by a single GI physiologist with over 25 years of experience. Correlation was performed in varied combinations based on the presence/absence and the size of hernias on different investigations. Results 74% (68) of patients were diagnosed to have a hiatal hernia on endoscopy whereas only 55% of the same group had a hiatal hernia on Barium studies. Of the 29 patients who had all the 3 investigations a hiatal hernia was diagnosed in 82% on endoscopy, 34% on Barium swallow and 48% on High resolution manometry. Only 21% of patients had correlation between all 3 studies. 62 percent had correlation between any 2 modalities and 17% did not have any correlation between any of the diagnostic modalities. The correlation in-between studies was greater for the moderate to large hernias and least for the small/absent hernias. Conclusion There exists considerable variation between the commonly performed procedures for this relatively presumed common condition. There is a greater observed tendency to diagnose a hiatal hernias on endoscopies and less on barium swallows based on the above study. The gold standard for the diagnosis is debatable, considering known limitations based on criteria for diagnosis, dynamic of the Oesophagogastric junction and operator variability. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest." @default.
• W2890561114 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890561114 creator A5033289103 @default.
• W2890561114 creator A5038824623 @default.
• W2890561114 creator A5043928368 @default.
• W2890561114 creator A5056529429 @default.
• W2890561114 date "2018-09-01" @default.
• W2890561114 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2890561114 title "PS01.073: HIATAL HERNIA—DIAGNOSIS AND RELEVANCE—THE CONUNDRUM CONTINUES…." @default.
• W2890561114 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy089.ps01.073" @default.
• W2890561114 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890561114 type Work @default.
• W2890561114 sameAs 2890561114 @default.
• W2890561114 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2890561114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890561114 hasAuthorship W2890561114A5033289103 @default.
• W2890561114 hasAuthorship W2890561114A5038824623 @default.
• W2890561114 hasAuthorship W2890561114A5043928368 @default.
• W2890561114 hasAuthorship W2890561114A5056529429 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C2778197217 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C126322002 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C158154518 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C17744445 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C199539241 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C2778197217 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C2779134260 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C43270747 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C61434518 @default.
• W2890561114 hasConceptScore W2890561114C71924100 @default.
• W2890561114 hasLocation W28905611141 @default.
• W2890561114 hasOpenAccess W2890561114 @default.
• W2890561114 hasPrimaryLocation W28905611141 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2071093118 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2378908708 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2408783266 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2410535298 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2411352163 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2412524630 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2413607924 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2413742181 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2416356806 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2416473679 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2417971982 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2422449980 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2444317807 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2474223756 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2484795307 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2552818829 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W2745627842 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W3024108535 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W3032731625 @default.
• W2890561114 hasRelatedWork W3044856496 @default.
• W2890561114 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2890561114 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2890561114 magId "2890561114" @default.
• W2890561114 workType "article" @default.