FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890788130> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890788130 endingPage "546" @default.
• W2890788130 startingPage "531" @default.
• W2890788130 abstract "More than half of Brazilian territory (54%), or approx. 463 million ha, is covered by forests. Public forest ownership dominates with up to 80%, private forests cover cca. 20% and cca. 8% is unclaimed. In public forests the practice of concessions is growing, with the expectation of reducing the problem of Amazonian illegal loggings. Private forests are mainly under plantation management, which generates 5.5% of the country’s industrial gross domestic product. Relevance of both is accordingly high, although not dominant in forest share. A key question for forest policy is how successfully the state regulates both issues in practice. Our paper accordingly focuses on the Brazilian Forest Service and the Ministry of Agriculture, which are state forest institutions in charge of forest concessions and planted forests. We look at their performance against legally based forestry goals and rely on primary (participatory observation, semi-structured personal interviews and questionnaire) and secondary sources (documents) for empirical evidence. The 3 L Model serves as a theoretical basis. It was selected while applying criteria and indicators for evaluation of public institutions´ comprehensive performance with respect to sustainable forest management. The results show that Brazilian forest policy strives toward sustainable forest management, as an overall goal. In more particular, the performance of both examined state forest institutions is more market (than public demand) oriented and moves towards strengthening market competences. At the same time, there are constrains in sustaining forest stands. Due to permanent and strong conflicts related to land use changes in Brazil, the relevance of a mediator, aiming to harmonize all different interests related to forest protection and use, is high, but this role is still not taken, at least not by the evaluated state forest institutions. This represents new task for the forestry practice, while facilitating diverse interests in Brazilian forests could not only be a contribution toward conflict management between environmental, forestry and agribusiness actors but could also grant stronger political role to respective state forest institution(s). For attending this role, the performance evaluation of the whole and rather complex forest-related institutional setting in Brazil could provide relevant science-based policy arguments. This paper shows that the 3 L Model could be applied for such evaluation, as it was possible to adapt it to a non-European country and get a comprehensive overview of Brazilian plantation and concession forestry in practice." @default.
• W2890788130 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890788130 creator A5002860270 @default.
• W2890788130 creator A5036352860 @default.
• W2890788130 creator A5046060134 @default.
• W2890788130 creator A5070402770 @default.
• W2890788130 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2890788130 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2890788130 title "Brazilian State Forest Institutions: Implementation of forestry goals evaluated by the 3L Model" @default.
• W2890788130 cites W1970951922 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W1975120950 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W1990150566 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W1990783472 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W1999138869 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2002266515 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2005594876 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2007749020 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2007823014 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2013680310 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2033013084 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2067515675 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2068240313 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2068927564 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2078115557 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2084500303 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2097851790 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2107200484 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2111135681 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2115133114 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2118672468 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2123672250 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2124070575 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2138804088 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2139610841 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2155097026 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2271756037 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2397204130 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2462933118 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2556187690 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2793510538 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W2800668812 @default.
• W2890788130 cites W610988695 @default.
• W2890788130 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.004" @default.
• W2890788130 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890788130 type Work @default.
• W2890788130 sameAs 2890788130 @default.
• W2890788130 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2890788130 countsByYear W28907881302019 @default.
• W2890788130 countsByYear W28907881302020 @default.
• W2890788130 countsByYear W28907881302021 @default.
• W2890788130 countsByYear W28907881302022 @default.
• W2890788130 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890788130 hasAuthorship W2890788130A5002860270 @default.
• W2890788130 hasAuthorship W2890788130A5036352860 @default.
• W2890788130 hasAuthorship W2890788130A5046060134 @default.
• W2890788130 hasAuthorship W2890788130A5070402770 @default.
• W2890788130 hasBestOaLocation W28907881302 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C121850381 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C203663800 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C2775841215 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C2780086105 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C2780944931 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C54625482 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C107826830 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C121850381 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C144133560 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C158154518 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C162324750 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C17744445 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C199539241 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C203663800 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C205649164 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C2775841215 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C2780086105 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C2780944931 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C28631016 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C54625482 @default.
• W2890788130 hasConceptScore W2890788130C97137747 @default.
• W2890788130 hasLocation W28907881301 @default.
• W2890788130 hasLocation W28907881302 @default.
• W2890788130 hasOpenAccess W2890788130 @default.
• W2890788130 hasPrimaryLocation W28907881301 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W1532620151 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W1587171422 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W2180662192 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W2189578508 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W2890788130 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W3093509141 @default.
• W2890788130 hasRelatedWork W3157595236 @default.

• next