FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890837396> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890837396 abstract "Previous studies have identified physics students’ difficulties with graph slope and area under a graph in different contexts. In this study we compared physics and nonphysics (psychology) students’ understanding of graphs; i.e., we evaluated the effects of concept (graph slope vs area under graph), type of question (qualitative vs quantitative), and context (physics vs finance) on their scores, strategies, and eye-tracking data. All students solved questions about graph slope better than the questions about area under a graph. Psychology students scored rather low on the questions about area under a graph, and physics students spent more time on questions about area under a graph than on slope questions, indicating that understanding of area under a graph is quite a difficult concept that seems unlikely to develop spontaneously. Generally, physics students had comparable scores on the qualitative and quantitative questions, whereas psychology students solved qualitative questions much better. As expected, students’ scores and eye-tracking measures indicated that problems involving physics context were easier for physics students since they typically had higher scores and shorter total and axes viewing times for physics than finance questions. Some physics students may have transferred the concepts and techniques from physics to finance because they typically scored better than psychology students on the finance questions that were novel for both groups. Analysis of student strategies showed that physics students mostly relied on strategies learned in physics courses, with strong emphasis on the use of formulas, whereas psychology students mostly used common-sense strategies, as they did not know the physics formulas. The implications of the results for teaching and learning about graphs in physics courses are also discussed.Received 19 April 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020109Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasConcepts & principlesStudent preparationPhysics Education Research" @default.
• W2890837396 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890837396 creator A5021729287 @default.
• W2890837396 creator A5025840221 @default.
• W2890837396 creator A5047412950 @default.
• W2890837396 creator A5056047497 @default.
• W2890837396 creator A5088521534 @default.
• W2890837396 date "2018-09-18" @default.
• W2890837396 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2890837396 title "Student understanding of graph slope and area under a graph: A comparison of physics and nonphysics students" @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1963691908 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1965931120 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1973613120 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1978697506 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1987414981 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1996305015 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W1997055539 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2001533929 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2004287174 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2009285104 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2011709434 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2012487898 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2012522957 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2020631265 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2022933870 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2026701456 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2033083623 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2033201519 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2036408820 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2036498697 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2037623486 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2040048604 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2058906977 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2062738329 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2065281318 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2067970057 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2073617814 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2088519197 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2089600355 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2091412557 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2095371090 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2102513235 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2108566571 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2112365876 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2117011390 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2134559922 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2149036282 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2154148036 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2165363078 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2171138899 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2313925842 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2412881022 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2528851042 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2607275994 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2735384935 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2751988671 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2766484862 @default.
• W2890837396 cites W2766900470 @default.
• W2890837396 doi "https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020109" @default.
• W2890837396 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890837396 type Work @default.
• W2890837396 sameAs 2890837396 @default.
• W2890837396 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962018 @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962019 @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962020 @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962021 @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962022 @default.
• W2890837396 countsByYear W28908373962023 @default.
• W2890837396 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890837396 hasAuthorship W2890837396A5021729287 @default.
• W2890837396 hasAuthorship W2890837396A5025840221 @default.
• W2890837396 hasAuthorship W2890837396A5047412950 @default.
• W2890837396 hasAuthorship W2890837396A5056047497 @default.
• W2890837396 hasAuthorship W2890837396A5088521534 @default.
• W2890837396 hasBestOaLocation W28908373961 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C132525143 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C50773583 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C114614502 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C121332964 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C132525143 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C145420912 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C151730666 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C15744967 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C2779343474 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C33923547 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C50773583 @default.
• W2890837396 hasConceptScore W2890837396C86803240 @default.
• W2890837396 hasFunder F4320310928 @default.
• W2890837396 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2890837396 hasLocation W28908373961 @default.
• W2890837396 hasOpenAccess W2890837396 @default.

• next