FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890864701> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890864701 abstract "Direct clinical assessment is the mainstay of evaluation in dentistry education. An effective evaluation method in prosthodontics should be equally valid and consistent; however, this is not attained frequently. A limited number of studies have applied an analytic evaluation in prosthodontics.To compare the intra- and inter-raters' variability in two evaluation methods: glance and grade (global), and checklist and criteria (analytical). Moreover, to identify the components of the analytical evaluation system and its applicability.This cross-sectional study was carried out on outpatients attending removable prosthodontics clinics affiliated with King Abdulaziz University (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) from December 2017 to April 2018. Two prosthodontist examiners evaluated a sample of 35 complete denture cases (20 male, 15 female) twice over a period of five months. Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement were computed using reliability test (interclass correlation coefficient ICC). Data were analyzed in IBM SPSS version 23, using paired-samples t-test, weighted kappa, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05.The intra-rater agreement for the first and second exposures under global and analytical evaluation methods with Examiner A was outstanding with 90.7% and 99.8% agreement respectively. While with Examiner B, global was lower but still in the acceptable range with about 78.1%, and 96.1% for the analytical evaluation. Inter-rater reliability analysis showed high agreement between the two raters in the first exposure of the analytical evaluation with 97.3%, while it was 87.5% in the global evaluation. This trend goes the same with analytical in the second exposure with 93.2%; however, the second exposure under global evaluation failed the cut off, which is only 56.6% agreement. In evaluation of inter-raters agreement, the second exposure of the global method demonstrated inconsistency between the two examiners (p=0.002), while the analytical second exposure demonstrated more homogeneity (p=0.050). Intra-rater variability between first and second exposure in analytical evaluation was (0.711 for the first rater and 0.677 for the second rater). Intra-rater variability between first and second exposure in global evaluation was (<0.001 for the first rater and 0.075 for the second rater).A simple objective and detailed method to evaluate complete denture insertion procedure was developed, and it showed that both intra-rater and inter-rater agreement were excellent for the analytical method that might overcome errors and subjectivity in evaluation that result from the limitations of global method. Results recommend suitability of using the analytical evaluation to improve reliability between raters." @default.
• W2890864701 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890864701 creator A5033548171 @default.
• W2890864701 creator A5038770541 @default.
• W2890864701 date "2018-09-10" @default.
• W2890864701 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2890864701 title "Inter-rater and intra-raters’ variability in evaluating complete dentures insertion procedure in senior undergraduates’ prosthodontics clinics" @default.
• W2890864701 cites W1778195743 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W1852001767 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W1967181729 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2060864692 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2098148123 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2099596039 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2142704172 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2150019722 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2151505081 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2153874293 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2186024363 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2277084258 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2337688151 @default.
• W2890864701 cites W2523219615 @default.
• W2890864701 doi "https://doi.org/10.19082/7287" @default.
• W2890864701 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6140989" @default.
• W2890864701 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30258562" @default.
• W2890864701 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890864701 type Work @default.
• W2890864701 sameAs 2890864701 @default.
• W2890864701 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2890864701 countsByYear W28908647012021 @default.
• W2890864701 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890864701 hasAuthorship W2890864701A5033548171 @default.
• W2890864701 hasAuthorship W2890864701A5038770541 @default.
• W2890864701 hasBestOaLocation W28908647011 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C163864269 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2776510725 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2777634892 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2780062004 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C2910757671 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C105795698 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C12868164 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C151730666 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C15744967 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C163864269 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C180747234 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C199343813 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C206041023 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2524010 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2776510725 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2777267654 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2777634892 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2778724333 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2779356329 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2780062004 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C2910757671 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C29694066 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C33923547 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C61863361 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C71924100 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C83849319 @default.
• W2890864701 hasConceptScore W2890864701C86803240 @default.
• W2890864701 hasLocation W28908647011 @default.
• W2890864701 hasLocation W28908647012 @default.
• W2890864701 hasLocation W28908647013 @default.
• W2890864701 hasLocation W28908647014 @default.
• W2890864701 hasOpenAccess W2890864701 @default.
• W2890864701 hasPrimaryLocation W28908647011 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W125144829 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W185844496 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W1981766656 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W1998912121 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2033689643 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2037284391 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2068492868 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2130394057 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2149553081 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2154452833 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2381946342 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2409925170 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2773408260 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2941641231 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W2960048680 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W3083129482 @default.
• W2890864701 hasRelatedWork W3111042561 @default.

• next