FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890951185> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890951185 endingPage "e10296" @default.
• W2890951185 startingPage "e10296" @default.
• W2890951185 abstract "Older patients with cancer are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. A geriatric assessment (GA) is a compilation of reliable and validated tools to assess domains that are predictors of morbidity and mortality, and it can be used to guide interventions. However, the implementation of GA and GA-driven interventions is low due to resource and time limitations. GA-driven interventions delivered through a mobile app may support the complex needs of older patients with cancer and their caregivers.We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of a novel app (TouchStream) and to identify barriers to its use. As an exploratory aim, we gathered preliminary data on symptom burden, health care utilization, and satisfaction.In a single-site pilot study, we included patients aged ≥65 years undergoing treatment for systemic cancer and their caregivers. TouchStream consists of a mobile app and a Web portal. Patients underwent a GA at baseline with the study team (on paper), and the results were used to guide interventions delivered through the app. A tablet preloaded with the app was provided for use at home for 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included usability (system usability scale of >68 is considered above average), recruitment, retention (number of subjects consented who completed postintervention assessments), and percentage of days subjects used the app. For the last 8 patients, we assessed their symptom burden (severity and interference with 17-items scored from 0-10 where a higher score indicates worse symptoms) using a clinical symptom inventory, health care utilization from the electronic medical records, and satisfaction (6 items scored on a 5-point Likert Scale for both patients and caregivers where a higher score indicates higher satisfaction) using a modified satisfaction survey. Barriers to use were elicited through interviews.A total of 18 patients (mean age 76.8, range 68-87) and 13 caregivers (mean age 69.8, range 38-81) completed the baseline assessment. Recruitment and retention rates were 67% and 80%, respectively. The mean SUS score was 74.0 for patients and 72.2 for caregivers. Mean percentage of days the TouchStream app was used was 78.7%. Mean symptom severity and interference scores were 1.6 and 2.8 at preintervention, and 0.9 and 1.5 at postintervention, respectively. There was a total of 27 clinic calls during the intervention period and 15 during the postintervention period (week 5-8). One patient was hospitalized during the intervention period (week 1-4) and two patients during the postintervention period (week 5-8). Mean satisfaction scores of patients and caregivers with the mobile app were 20.4 and 23.4, respectively. Barriers fell into 3 themes: general experience, design, and functionality.TouchStream is feasible and usable for older patients on cancer treatment and their caregivers. Future studies should evaluate the effects of the TouchStream on symptoms and health care utilization in a randomized fashion." @default.
• W2890951185 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5008975075 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5012940331 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5015919021 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5017476612 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5029311650 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5031707978 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5038508194 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5045867757 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5048210530 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5049763438 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5071436042 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5076550283 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5085090953 @default.
• W2890951185 creator A5090143035 @default.
• W2890951185 date "2018-10-29" @default.
• W2890951185 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2890951185 title "Novel mHealth App to Deliver Geriatric Assessment-Driven Interventions for Older Adults With Cancer: Pilot Feasibility and Usability Study" @default.
• W2890951185 cites W1504773578 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W1969969761 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W1992675453 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W1999327608 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2001734764 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2009971868 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2015452448 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2022026517 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2032191478 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2036558184 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2047503765 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2063861120 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2070183833 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2089136119 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2096657471 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2100569394 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2103162037 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2104119749 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2107845564 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2118941199 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2121977448 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2128529067 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2142225512 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2153294383 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2165758561 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2195040438 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2292449653 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2398917392 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2411034445 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2511338881 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2528730065 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2560207949 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2595307528 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2604093837 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2608030316 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2620925856 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2791168386 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2793339053 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2804780558 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W2807752634 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W3159078634 @default.
• W2890951185 cites W570516305 @default.
• W2890951185 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/10296" @default.
• W2890951185 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6234352" @default.
• W2890951185 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30373733" @default.
• W2890951185 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890951185 type Work @default.
• W2890951185 sameAs 2890951185 @default.
• W2890951185 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2890951185 countsByYear W28909511852019 @default.
• W2890951185 countsByYear W28909511852020 @default.
• W2890951185 countsByYear W28909511852021 @default.
• W2890951185 countsByYear W28909511852022 @default.
• W2890951185 countsByYear W28909511852023 @default.
• W2890951185 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5008975075 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5012940331 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5015919021 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5017476612 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5029311650 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5031707978 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5038508194 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5045867757 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5048210530 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5049763438 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5071436042 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5076550283 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5085090953 @default.
• W2890951185 hasAuthorship W2890951185A5090143035 @default.
• W2890951185 hasBestOaLocation W28909511851 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2890951185 hasConcept C2779363104 @default.

• next