FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890976359> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890976359 abstract "Importance Despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative rehabilitation, long-term anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture rate remains high. The increasing number of primary ACL reconstructions in an ageing population will lead to increasing revision reconstructions. Revision cases may have higher failure rates and worse patient-reported outcomes compared with primaries. While two-stage revisions may be indicated in certain complex cases, whether this is comparatively equivalent or even superior to revisions done in a single stage would assist preoperative planning. Objective The objective of this systematic review was to analyse and compare patient-reported outcomes and failure rate of single-stage versus two-stage revision ACL reconstruction. Evidence review Using PubMed, MEDLINE Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases, a review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines to identify level I–IV outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Findings Three studies reported outcomes of two-stage revisions with mean follow-up of 61.6 months, while 21 studies reported single-stage revisions with mean follow-up of 47.4 months. Pooled rate of two-stage revisions was 3.1% compared with 6.8% in single-stage (p=0.068). Clinical failure was reported in 5.1% of 79 two-stage patients compared with 13.8% of 533 single-stage patients (p<0.05). Within the single-stage cohort, there was a greater clinical failure rate (+8.7%, p<0.05) for patients with less than 48 months follow-up. Those with > 48 months follow-up had a higher rerupture rate (+5%, p<0.05) and a significantly greater sum of squared deviations (p<0.05) compared with those with < 48 months follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes have demonstrated two-stage revision patients with higher IKDC A and B scores than single-stage. Conclusions and relevance Although two-stage revisions may be performed in more complex cases, there are limited short-term data available regarding their outcomes. Two-stage revisions demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes and lower rate of revision surgery and clinical failure compared with single-stage revisions. Studies with shorter follow-up (24–48 months) showed higher clinical failure rates. Those with longer follow-up (>48 months) showed higher graft rerupture rates. The decision to perform staged reconstruction should made on whether adequate tunnel placement and fixation can be established in a single setting. Level of evidence Level IV." @default.
• W2890976359 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890976359 creator A5027183507 @default.
• W2890976359 creator A5031501162 @default.
• W2890976359 creator A5048144576 @default.
• W2890976359 creator A5081593987 @default.
• W2890976359 creator A5086067760 @default.
• W2890976359 date "2018-09-15" @default.
• W2890976359 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2890976359 title "Single-stage versus two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review" @default.
• W2890976359 cites W1945213617 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W1979918768 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W1982047702 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W1984657995 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2001850098 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2013029886 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2028839860 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2031551181 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2033086396 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2035661762 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2048763719 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2053215919 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2070657710 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2072916459 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2074132505 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2074993897 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2080847294 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2107901539 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2110393682 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2114272290 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2126732558 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2139174436 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2140608891 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2147180186 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2166165300 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2322953525 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2607104454 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2608531961 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W2773664734 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W6624005 @default.
• W2890976359 cites W999537828 @default.
• W2890976359 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2017-000192" @default.
• W2890976359 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890976359 type Work @default.
• W2890976359 sameAs 2890976359 @default.
• W2890976359 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2890976359 countsByYear W28909763592019 @default.
• W2890976359 countsByYear W28909763592021 @default.
• W2890976359 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890976359 hasAuthorship W2890976359A5027183507 @default.
• W2890976359 hasAuthorship W2890976359A5031501162 @default.
• W2890976359 hasAuthorship W2890976359A5048144576 @default.
• W2890976359 hasAuthorship W2890976359A5081593987 @default.
• W2890976359 hasAuthorship W2890976359A5086067760 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C141071460 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C146357865 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C151730666 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C17744445 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C189708586 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C199539241 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C2778434673 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C2779473830 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C2780887989 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C71924100 @default.
• W2890976359 hasConceptScore W2890976359C86803240 @default.
• W2890976359 hasLocation W28909763591 @default.
• W2890976359 hasOpenAccess W2890976359 @default.
• W2890976359 hasPrimaryLocation W28909763591 @default.
• W2890976359 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2890976359 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2890976359 magId "2890976359" @default.
• W2890976359 workType "article" @default.