Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891029062> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W2891029062 abstract "In Herring v. United States, Chief Justice John Roberts reframed the Supreme Court’s understanding of the exclusionary rule: “As laid out in our cases, the exclusionary rule serves to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct, or in some circumstances recurring or systemic negligence.” The open question remains: how can defendants demonstrate sufficient recurring or systemic negligence to warrant exclusion? The Supreme Court has never answered the question, although the absence of systemic or recurring problems has figured prominently in two recent exclusionary rule decisions. Without the ability to document recurring failures, or patterns of police misconduct, courts can dismiss individual constitutional violations merely as examples of “isolated negligence.”But, what if new data-driven surveillance technologies could track police-citizen interactions and uncover recurring or systemic problems? What if stops and arrests could be data-mined to reveal systemic racial bias? What if new surveillance technologies could record police-citizen stops to monitor patterns of unconstitutional practices? What if predictive analytics could identify at-risk officers in order to predict future misconduct?This Article looks to invert the big data surveillance gaze from the citizen to the police. It asks whether the same big data policing technologies built to track movements, actions, and patterns of criminal activity could be redesigned to foster data-driven police accountability. Tracking this “blue data” and studying the systemic errors will offer concrete answers to the open questions surrounding the Supreme Court’s new exclusionary rules.Unquestionably, the use of data mining, surveillance, and predictive analytics to target police negligence will face resistance. Police officers, administrators, and unions will likely protest the invasion of personal and professional privacy it threatens. Yet, this response of resistance is itself revealing and worth studying. This resistance offers a provocative thought experiment: how could police objections to new forms of surveillance inform community resistance to similar mass surveillance technologies? This article examines how police, courts, and litigants will resist a push to police surveillance and what that resistance means for current mass surveillance practices, law, and policy." @default.
- W2891029062 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2891029062 creator A5028412388 @default.
- W2891029062 date "2018-03-16" @default.
- W2891029062 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2891029062 title "The Exclusionary Rule in the Age of Blue Data" @default.
- W2891029062 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2891029062 type Work @default.
- W2891029062 sameAs 2891029062 @default.
- W2891029062 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2891029062 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2891029062 hasAuthorship W2891029062A5028412388 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C2776916960 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C2781298881 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C10138342 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C102587632 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C144024400 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C144133560 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C17744445 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C199539241 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C2776916960 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C2778272461 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C2780587575 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C2781298881 @default.
- W2891029062 hasConceptScore W2891029062C73484699 @default.
- W2891029062 hasLocation W28910290621 @default.
- W2891029062 hasOpenAccess W2891029062 @default.
- W2891029062 hasPrimaryLocation W28910290621 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W1604146610 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2058947917 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2107191007 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2338563048 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2423172665 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2783332218 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W283173553 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2908505479 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2964971006 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3020144006 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3122911859 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3122932735 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3123178609 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3125492513 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3125855053 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3153853615 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W3201367451 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W36514296 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W645057629 @default.
- W2891029062 hasRelatedWork W2532044275 @default.
- W2891029062 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2891029062 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2891029062 magId "2891029062" @default.
- W2891029062 workType "article" @default.