FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891084068> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891084068 endingPage "1933" @default.
• W2891084068 startingPage "1925" @default.
• W2891084068 abstract "Aims Cardiac rehabilitation is one of the most cost-effective interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease. Worldwide supervised group-based cardiac rehabilitation is the dominant mode of delivery followed by facilitated self-managed (FSM), which is emerging as part of a cardiac rehabilitation menu. Modern research evidence, using trials and well-resourced interventions, suggests FSM is comparable to supervised rehabilitation in its outcomes for patients; however, this is yet to be established using routine clinical practice data. Methods Including 81,626 patients from routine clinical data in the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation, this observational study investigated whether mode of delivery, supervised or FSM, was associated with similar cardiac rehabilitation outcomes. Hierarchical regression models included patient and service covariates such as age, gender, cardiac rehabilitation duration and programme staff type. Results The results showed 85% of the population received supervised cardiac rehabilitation. The FSM group were significantly older, female and predominantly in lower socioeconomic groups. The results showed that all patients on average benefit from cardiac rehabilitation, independently of mode of delivery, across all risk factors. Additional benefit of 13% and 11.4% increased likelihood of achieving the target state for physical activity and body mass index respectively when using FSM approaches. Conclusion This is the first study to investigate traditional cardiovascular risk factors with cardiac rehabilitation mode of delivery using routine clinical data. Both modes of delivery were associated with comparable statistically significant positive outcomes. Despite having equivalent outcomes, FSM cardiac rehabilitation continues to be underutilised, with less than 20% of patients receiving this mode of delivery in the UK." @default.
• W2891084068 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891084068 creator A5012909814 @default.
• W2891084068 creator A5059063817 @default.
• W2891084068 date "2018-09-06" @default.
• W2891084068 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2891084068 title "Does the mode of delivery in routine cardiac rehabilitation have an association with cardiovascular risk factor outcomes?" @default.
• W2891084068 cites W1574410810 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2002778671 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2037788046 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2079610683 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2100313222 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2134453898 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2152628136 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2159648860 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2179918351 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2307471531 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2471388550 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2533894588 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2566857943 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2620360426 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2648896539 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2787377854 @default.
• W2891084068 cites W2947483319 @default.
• W2891084068 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318798923" @default.
• W2891084068 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30188178" @default.
• W2891084068 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891084068 type Work @default.
• W2891084068 sameAs 2891084068 @default.
• W2891084068 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2891084068 countsByYear W28910840682018 @default.
• W2891084068 countsByYear W28910840682019 @default.
• W2891084068 countsByYear W28910840682020 @default.
• W2891084068 countsByYear W28910840682021 @default.
• W2891084068 countsByYear W28910840682022 @default.
• W2891084068 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891084068 hasAuthorship W2891084068A5012909814 @default.
• W2891084068 hasAuthorship W2891084068A5059063817 @default.
• W2891084068 hasBestOaLocation W28910840682 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C126322002 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C159110408 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C1862650 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C23131810 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C27415008 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C2778818304 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C2908647359 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C71924100 @default.
• W2891084068 hasConceptScore W2891084068C99454951 @default.
• W2891084068 hasIssue "18" @default.
• W2891084068 hasLocation W28910840681 @default.
• W2891084068 hasLocation W28910840682 @default.
• W2891084068 hasLocation W28910840683 @default.
• W2891084068 hasOpenAccess W2891084068 @default.
• W2891084068 hasPrimaryLocation W28910840681 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2007641510 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2098887317 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2136845584 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2598954484 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2963580927 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W3123632792 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W3190110062 @default.
• W2891084068 hasRelatedWork W2464797648 @default.
• W2891084068 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2891084068 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891084068 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891084068 magId "2891084068" @default.
• W2891084068 workType "article" @default.