Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891182022> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W2891182022 endingPage "2473011418S0044" @default.
- W2891182022 startingPage "2473011418S0044" @default.
- W2891182022 abstract "Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmotic injuries are a common athletic injury and involved in approximately 13% of ankle fractures. Screw fixation (SS) has been the most common fixation treatment for syndesmotic injury, however syndesmosis malreduction has been reported to occur up to more than 50% in syndesmotic screw fixation. Recently, suture-button fixation (SB) technique has been developed to restore anatomic function of the syndesmosis, with potential advantages of allowing physiological movement of syndesmosis, anatomic healing, avoidance of implant removal and earlier rehabilitation. However, optimal surgical treatment is still controversial to date. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of SB and SS fixation techniques for syndesmotic injuries with a meta-analysis of the clinical studies comparing SB and SS fixation for syndesmosis injuries. Methods: The literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify cohort studies comparing SB and SS fixation for syndesmosis injuries. The level of evidence (LOE) was assessed based on the criteria by the Oxford-Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Ten clinical studies were identified comparing 222 patients with SB to 235 patients with SS fixation. Patients treated with SB had a higher postoperative AOFAS score at a mean of 17.2 months (90.9 vs 87.3, p = 0.002). SB resulted in a lower rate of implant failure (0.0% vs 27.1%, p < 0.0001), implant removal failure (4.0% vs 37.5%, p < 0.0001), and joint malreduction (0.8% vs 10.7%, p = 0.009). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of other complications with SB (4.2% vs 8.6%, p = 0.21). Conclusion: SB fixation results in improved functional outcomes, lower rates of implant failure, and joint malreduction. Based on the findings of this meta-analysis SB appears to be favorable to SS for treating syndesmotic injuries." @default.
- W2891182022 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2891182022 creator A5006493623 @default.
- W2891182022 creator A5019167690 @default.
- W2891182022 creator A5052779013 @default.
- W2891182022 date "2018-07-01" @default.
- W2891182022 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2891182022 title "Suture Button versus Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmotic Injuries" @default.
- W2891182022 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418s00443" @default.
- W2891182022 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2891182022 type Work @default.
- W2891182022 sameAs 2891182022 @default.
- W2891182022 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2891182022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2891182022 hasAuthorship W2891182022A5006493623 @default.
- W2891182022 hasAuthorship W2891182022A5019167690 @default.
- W2891182022 hasAuthorship W2891182022A5052779013 @default.
- W2891182022 hasBestOaLocation W28911820221 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C106207104 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2776958826 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2780776439 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C106207104 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C141071460 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C146249460 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2776958826 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2777236700 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2778640784 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2780776439 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2781411149 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C2908647359 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C71924100 @default.
- W2891182022 hasConceptScore W2891182022C99454951 @default.
- W2891182022 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2891182022 hasLocation W28911820221 @default.
- W2891182022 hasOpenAccess W2891182022 @default.
- W2891182022 hasPrimaryLocation W28911820221 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2009334242 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2031652633 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2103673890 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2157881100 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2345287343 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2349312950 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2538614010 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2725849797 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W4367158672 @default.
- W2891182022 hasRelatedWork W2785096141 @default.
- W2891182022 hasVolume "3" @default.
- W2891182022 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2891182022 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2891182022 magId "2891182022" @default.
- W2891182022 workType "article" @default.