FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891217183> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891217183 endingPage "300" @default.
• W2891217183 startingPage "289" @default.
• W2891217183 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to surface and discuss issues associated with employee performance appraisal as a multi-staged social interaction reportedly the butt of managerial dissatisfaction, especially when used to inform decisions around pay and other rewards. Design/methodology/approach To substantiate the territory, existing management-based evidence from the published literature is curated and discussed to frame issues for investigation under the rubric of performance appraisal as an activity that may be understood as combining interaction between forms of administrative, social and psychologically oriented control. Primary evidence, drawn from recent research sponsored by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, which combines data sets informed by a survey of HR specialists and a follow-on focus group, is then used to illustrate views on relevant themes across a sample of UK-based private, public and third sector organizations ( n =715). Findings A significant number of organizations apply performance appraisal approaches, somewhat mediated by sector and size, and in turn use the results to inform various forms of HRM decision making – in particular reward management. While claims have been circulating in popular media suggesting the widespread abandonment of traditional performance appraisal, and while the study finds dissatisfaction regarding the utility of existing bureaucratic elements of appraisal mechanisms, the position is more nuanced. Practical implications Corporate management attention is drawn to choices of the extent to which they are investing in building line management capabilities to address the consequences of policy decisions to amplify the importance of informal alongside formal performance management processes, and potential reward decision making, mindful of the indeterminate character of the employment relationship and its dynamic, socially constructed character. Social implications Performance appraisal may benefit from re-interpreting the balance between emphasis on administrative, social and self-control, given changing expectations among workforce members and those who evaluate organizational effectiveness in contemporary society, and the ongoing contested nature of organizational control. Originality/value Employee performance appraisal as an institutional process central to organizational control systems is a topic of interest to both organizational effectiveness academics and the managerial practitioners they study. Using data that broadly represent recent developments in managerial practice across “UK plc”, the paper informs reflection on theory and practice." @default.
• W2891217183 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891217183 creator A5089764973 @default.
• W2891217183 date "2018-09-06" @default.
• W2891217183 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2891217183 title "Processing developments in employee performance and reward" @default.
• W2891217183 cites W1796718608 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2019364210 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2019490211 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2033270934 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2097052137 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2098534748 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2100255020 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2120314896 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2125291526 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2136727656 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2145958506 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2148940838 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2163741736 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2213306094 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W2739679421 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W4235699211 @default.
• W2891217183 cites W92240031 @default.
• W2891217183 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-07-2018-0049" @default.
• W2891217183 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891217183 type Work @default.
• W2891217183 sameAs 2891217183 @default.
• W2891217183 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2891217183 countsByYear W28912171832019 @default.
• W2891217183 countsByYear W28912171832021 @default.
• W2891217183 countsByYear W28912171832023 @default.
• W2891217183 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891217183 hasAuthorship W2891217183A5089764973 @default.
• W2891217183 hasBestOaLocation W28912171832 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C12532035 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C147859227 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C2777873905 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C40213455 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C111640148 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C12532035 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C144133560 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C145420912 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C147859227 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C15744967 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C162324750 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C162853370 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C17744445 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C185592680 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C187736073 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C198531522 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C199539241 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C2775924081 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C2777873905 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C39549134 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C40213455 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C43617362 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C51575053 @default.
• W2891217183 hasConceptScore W2891217183C94625758 @default.
• W2891217183 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2891217183 hasLocation W28912171831 @default.
• W2891217183 hasLocation W28912171832 @default.
• W2891217183 hasOpenAccess W2891217183 @default.
• W2891217183 hasPrimaryLocation W28912171831 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W14693799 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2016283329 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2559449518 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2775614314 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2891217183 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W2950529632 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W3130792476 @default.
• W2891217183 hasRelatedWork W4309966990 @default.
• W2891217183 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2891217183 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891217183 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891217183 magId "2891217183" @default.
• W2891217183 workType "article" @default.