FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891226488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891226488 endingPage "70" @default.
• W2891226488 startingPage "67" @default.
• W2891226488 abstract "Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the nonporous polyethylene barrier sheet as an alternative for nylon foil (SupraFOIL) implants in repair of orbital fractures. Methods: This is a prospective, case series using the Stryker 0.4-mm-thick nonporous polyethylene barrier sheet in all patients over the age of 18 years presenting with orbital fractures from December 2014 to June 2015. Patient’s age, location of fracture, etiology of injury, presence of preoperative restriction and diplopia, and postoperative diplopia and/or enophthalmos was recorded. Institutional review board approval was received, and consent was obtained from all participants. Patients were followed for at least 6 months when possible. Scanning electron microscopy was used to compare the thickness, surface characteristics, and porosity of the nonporous polyethylene barrier and nylon foil implants. Beam deflection testing was also performed to compare the biomechanical properties of each implant. Results: Forty-six patients who underwent repair of orbital fractures with the nonporous polyethylene barrier sheet were included in this series. Average age was 43.3 years (range: 18–84 years). Twenty-six of 46 patients (56.5%) were males, and 20 (43.4%) were females. The most common causes of injuries were assault (38.3%), falls (25.5%), motor vehicle accident (14.9%), and sports related (10.5%). Twenty of 46 patients (43.4%) had isolated orbital floor, and 2 patients (4.3%) had isolated medial wall fractures. Fifteen patients (32.6%) had combined floor and medial wall fractures involving the inferomedial orbital strut, and 9 (19.6%) had floor fractures associated with zygomaticomaxillary complex or lateral wall fractures. Twenty-eight patients (60.9%) had preoperative diplopia. Timing of surgery was between 3 and 55 days, with the median of 11.5 days. Five of 46 patients (10.8%) had residual diplopia at their 1-week postoperative visit, 4 of those patients’ diplopia had resolved at 2 months postoperatively. One patient had residual diplopia at 6-month follow up. Electron microscopy showed that the 0.4-mm nonporous polyethylene barrier implant was thinner (0.33 mm) than expected and thinner than 0.4-mm SupraFOIL (0.38 mm). Scanning electron microscopy exhibited that the surface of the nonporous polyethylene barrier was smooth and nonporous. Beam deflection testing showed that for small forces (<100 mN), the 2 materials behaved nearly identically, but at higher forces, the nonporous polyethylene implant exhibited less stiffness. Conclusions: The use of nonporous polyethylene barrier sheet implant for orbital fracture repair is a safe and effective alternative to nonporous nylon foil implants. There were no complications and one case of residual diplopia (2.1%) in this case series." @default.
• W2891226488 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5002288293 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5011158957 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5023612792 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5026206958 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5065024071 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5084124394 @default.
• W2891226488 creator A5088168295 @default.
• W2891226488 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2891226488 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2891226488 title "Early Experience With Nonporous Polyethylene Barrier Sheet in Orbital Fracture Repair" @default.
• W2891226488 cites W1543823799 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W1964092833 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W1965528684 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W1987466633 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2018234762 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2023994498 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2025394574 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2046268950 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2046855669 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2052337944 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2073754250 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2084885825 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2091728749 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2092082229 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2253691061 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2312735048 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2332336249 @default.
• W2891226488 cites W2749791010 @default.
• W2891226488 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000001176" @default.
• W2891226488 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30198963" @default.
• W2891226488 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2891226488 type Work @default.
• W2891226488 sameAs 2891226488 @default.
• W2891226488 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2891226488 countsByYear W28912264882019 @default.
• W2891226488 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5002288293 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5011158957 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5023612792 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5026206958 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5065024071 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5084124394 @default.
• W2891226488 hasAuthorship W2891226488A5088168295 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C2779157923 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C2779751980 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C2780581723 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C141071460 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C159985019 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C192562407 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C199343813 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C2779157923 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C2779751980 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C2780581723 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C2781411149 @default.
• W2891226488 hasConceptScore W2891226488C71924100 @default.
• W2891226488 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2891226488 hasLocation W28912264881 @default.
• W2891226488 hasLocation W28912264882 @default.
• W2891226488 hasOpenAccess W2891226488 @default.
• W2891226488 hasPrimaryLocation W28912264881 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W1984901674 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2010441427 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2075173967 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2090025775 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2207317003 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2210610793 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2249732809 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2398005273 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2438790994 @default.
• W2891226488 hasRelatedWork W2792150706 @default.
• W2891226488 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2891226488 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891226488 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891226488 magId "2891226488" @default.
• W2891226488 workType "article" @default.