FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891243112> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891243112 endingPage "S324" @default.
• W2891243112 startingPage "S318" @default.
• W2891243112 abstract "One of the most commonly performed surgical procedures by oral and maxillofacial surgeons all over the world is the removal of impacted teeth. The most critical and important steps in third molar extraction are bone cutting or osteotomy. Many techniques are used for this purpose including chisels and mallet, rotary instruments, and ultrasonic-based bone cutting instruments. Piezotome is newer and innovative device for osteotomy based on piezoelectric vibrations. Piezotome is considered very efficient in performing osteotomy because of its selective cutting; being inert against soft tissues, including nerves and blood vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of third molar surgery using conventional handpiece and piezotome with all other criteria remaining same for all the individuals.All patients reporting to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, for impacted mandibular third molar removal were screened. A total of 30 patients with same Pederson difficulty index for bilateral impacted third molar were selected for the study. The study involved the use of piezotome on one side (Side A) and rotary technique (Side B) on the other side for osteotomy on the same patient with an interval of 1 month. Therapeutic management was same for both the sides. Operating time was recorded in each surgery. Patients were examined postoperatively on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day and pain, edema, trismus, paresthesia, and dry socket were evaluated and compared on both the sides. Data collected were analyzed statistically.The mean operating time was 48.13 min in piezotome (Side A) and 32.90 min in conventional handpiece (Side B) which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in the level of pain (P < 0.001), number of analgesics taken (P < 0.001), and trismus (P < 0.01) on 1st, 3rd, and 7th days postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in edema between the two sides. Paresthesia was present in one patient (3.3%) in Side B, while no paresthesia was present in Side A. No incidence of alveolar osteitis was reported on both the sides.Operating time with piezotome was more than that of conventional handpiece, but the postoperative responses such as pain, trismus, and edema were less in piezotome. Hence, despite being a slower procedure, piezotome can be an effective alternative for osteotomy in impacted third molar surgery. We recommend using piezotome for bone cutting and conventional rotary handpiece for tooth sectioning in order to obtain favorable outcomes as well as decreasing the operating time." @default.
• W2891243112 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891243112 creator A5005320107 @default.
• W2891243112 creator A5066053058 @default.
• W2891243112 creator A5090953544 @default.
• W2891243112 date "2018-09-01" @default.
• W2891243112 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2891243112 title "Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece." @default.
• W2891243112 cites W196770844 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W1970595241 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W1974250647 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W1975936929 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W1999042584 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2000961396 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2001821607 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2007321486 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2008798820 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2011014804 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2012351267 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2029401518 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2033688532 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2064756559 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2068174842 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2068975212 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2086728433 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2097153205 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2098696168 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2113641009 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2127371495 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2171308689 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W2400417361 @default.
• W2891243112 cites W4254422007 @default.
• W2891243112 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_354_18" @default.
• W2891243112 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6169275" @default.
• W2891243112 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30294165" @default.
• W2891243112 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891243112 type Work @default.
• W2891243112 sameAs 2891243112 @default.
• W2891243112 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2891243112 countsByYear W28912431122020 @default.
• W2891243112 countsByYear W28912431122021 @default.
• W2891243112 countsByYear W28912431122022 @default.
• W2891243112 countsByYear W28912431122023 @default.
• W2891243112 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891243112 hasAuthorship W2891243112A5005320107 @default.
• W2891243112 hasAuthorship W2891243112A5066053058 @default.
• W2891243112 hasAuthorship W2891243112A5090953544 @default.
• W2891243112 hasBestOaLocation W28912431121 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C2778636310 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C2778838824 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C136948725 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C141071460 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C199343813 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C202271784 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C2776389721 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C2778636310 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C2778838824 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C29694066 @default.
• W2891243112 hasConceptScore W2891243112C71924100 @default.
• W2891243112 hasIssue "Suppl 2" @default.
• W2891243112 hasLocation W28912431121 @default.
• W2891243112 hasLocation W28912431122 @default.
• W2891243112 hasLocation W28912431123 @default.
• W2891243112 hasLocation W28912431124 @default.
• W2891243112 hasLocation W28912431125 @default.
• W2891243112 hasOpenAccess W2891243112 @default.
• W2891243112 hasPrimaryLocation W28912431121 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W1975072494 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2002925066 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2017761612 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2093381641 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2098696168 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2891243112 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2953308841 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W2961762731 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W4213012988 @default.
• W2891243112 hasRelatedWork W4299285278 @default.
• W2891243112 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W2891243112 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891243112 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891243112 magId "2891243112" @default.
• W2891243112 workType "article" @default.