FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891266585> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891266585 endingPage "363" @default.
• W2891266585 startingPage "363" @default.
• W2891266585 abstract "Objective The acuity and number of presentations being made to emergency departments (EDs) is increasing. In an effort to safely and efficiently manage this increase and optimise patient outcomes, innovative models of care (MOC) have been implemented. What is not clear is how these MOC reflect the needs of patients or relate to each other or to ED performance. The aim of this study was to describe ED MOC in Queensland, Australia. Methods Situated within a larger mixed-methods study, the present study was a cross-sectional study. In early 2015, leaders (medical directors and nurse managers) from public hospital EDs in Queensland were invited to complete a survey detailing ED activity, staffing profiles, treatment space, MOC and National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) performance. Routinely collected ED information system data was also used. Results Twenty of the 27 EDs invited participated in the study (response rate 74%). An extensive array of MOC were identified that were categorised into those that facilitate input, throughput and output from the ED. There was no consistent evidence as to the relative effectiveness of these MOC in achieving ED performance benchmarks, such as NEAT performance. Conclusion There is considerable variability in the MOC used throughout EDs in Queensland. A more complete analysis of the relative effectiveness of different MOC either in isolation or as part of a comprehensive approach would help inform more consistent MOC in Queensland EDs. What is known about the topic? MOC in any given ED are implemented in response to factors such as the geographical location of the hospital, hospital-specific characteristics and service profile, staffing profile and patient demographic profile. In the era of time-based targets, they may also serve to address a particular aspect of flow in the face of rising ED demand. Although many of the MOC attempt to deal with flow in a linear fashion, target specific phases of the ED journey or address particular patient cohorts, what is clear is that not all EDs are shaped and formed the same. What does this paper add? The study provides a comprehensive description of the varied models of care operating within Queensland public hospital EDs and how they relate to ED performance. A basic taxonomy of contemporary ED MOC is necessary to allow comparison between departments and inform decisions regarding safety, efficiency and cost-effectiveness. What are the implications to practitioners? A contemporary understanding of the presence and profile of ED MOC that currently exist within a network of hospitals and health services is important for managers, clinicians and patients to inform decision-making regarding the safety, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these models. This understanding can also inform where and how further improvements in care delivery can progress." @default.
• W2891266585 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5006437662 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5015841297 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5022056996 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5026307122 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5031221616 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5069219276 @default.
• W2891266585 creator A5078577268 @default.
• W2891266585 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2891266585 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2891266585 title "Emergency department models of care in Queensland: a multisite cross-sectional study" @default.
• W2891266585 cites W1698748000 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W1831573248 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W1952069351 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2043693404 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2055590803 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2058681587 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2063725531 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2112835503 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2116621279 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2139890037 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2143649626 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2148892351 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2268156341 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2276578535 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2363719834 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2373278742 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2511201518 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2552654354 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2598959401 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2607945686 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2727347395 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W2768420272 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W572387047 @default.
• W2891266585 cites W980556214 @default.
• W2891266585 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah17233" @default.
• W2891266585 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30189180" @default.
• W2891266585 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2891266585 type Work @default.
• W2891266585 sameAs 2891266585 @default.
• W2891266585 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2891266585 countsByYear W28912665852020 @default.
• W2891266585 countsByYear W28912665852023 @default.
• W2891266585 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5006437662 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5015841297 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5022056996 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5026307122 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5031221616 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5069219276 @default.
• W2891266585 hasAuthorship W2891266585A5078577268 @default.
• W2891266585 hasBestOaLocation W28912665851 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C2777512617 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C127413603 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C142052008 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C142724271 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C159110408 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C17744445 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C199539241 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C21547014 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C2777512617 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C2778139618 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C2780724011 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C545542383 @default.
• W2891266585 hasConceptScore W2891266585C71924100 @default.
• W2891266585 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2891266585 hasLocation W28912665851 @default.
• W2891266585 hasLocation W28912665852 @default.
• W2891266585 hasLocation W28912665853 @default.
• W2891266585 hasLocation W28912665854 @default.
• W2891266585 hasOpenAccess W2891266585 @default.
• W2891266585 hasPrimaryLocation W28912665851 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W1556886379 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2020284978 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2026095104 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2321408404 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2510700473 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2788233513 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W3198745799 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W4238308949 @default.
• W2891266585 hasRelatedWork W4299701137 @default.
• W2891266585 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2891266585 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891266585 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891266585 magId "2891266585" @default.

• next