Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891293794> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W2891293794 abstract "The article considers the current discussion on the possibilities and limitations of different theoretical-methodological approaches to the study of the representation of expert knowledge in court proceedings, and on the peculiarities of interaction of forensic experts and jurists. The author emphasizes contribution and methodological limitations of the interpretative traditions and focuses on the potential of the actor-network theory for the study of interaction of forensic experts and jurists, such as implementation of Bruno Latour’s principle of “generalized symmetry” and the concept “juridical chain” for the analysis of the legal sphere. The author believes that Latour’s exclusive attention to the “specific rationality” of judicial practice prevented him from revealing complex trajectories of networks both within and outside the particular legal institution that he studied. The article claims that representatives of science and technology studies contribute to de-legitimization of the results of scientific research represented in forensic expert reports for this approach ignores the asymmetry of power relations between experts and jurists. Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of the juridical field allows to overcome the one-sidedness of the actor-network theory for it considers the inner logic of the juridical field development, reveals the asymmetry of power relations within it, competition between bearers of different forms of juridical capital with specific interests and resources, and the influence of other fields on the juridical field. The author believes that the most promising perspective is the combination of actor-network theory, its interpretations in science and technology studies and Bourdieu’s theory of the juridical field, which would allow to analyze not only the inner logic of circulation of expert knowledge but also the external context of its production and transformations within the juridical field." @default.
- W2891293794 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2891293794 creator A5010436797 @default.
- W2891293794 creator A5088141698 @default.
- W2891293794 date "2018-01-01" @default.
- W2891293794 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2891293794 title "SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF JURISTS AND FORENSIC EXPERTS: THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES" @default.
- W2891293794 doi "https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-3-404-417" @default.
- W2891293794 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2891293794 type Work @default.
- W2891293794 sameAs 2891293794 @default.
- W2891293794 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2891293794 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2891293794 hasAuthorship W2891293794A5010436797 @default.
- W2891293794 hasAuthorship W2891293794A5088141698 @default.
- W2891293794 hasBestOaLocation W28912937941 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C111472728 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C121332964 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C12713177 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C138885662 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C144024400 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C154945302 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C163258240 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C17744445 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C199539241 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C201717286 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C202444582 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C33923547 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C41008148 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C62520636 @default.
- W2891293794 hasConceptScore W2891293794C9652623 @default.
- W2891293794 hasLocation W28912937941 @default.
- W2891293794 hasOpenAccess W2891293794 @default.
- W2891293794 hasPrimaryLocation W28912937941 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W168808366 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W1973021824 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2037935343 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2098947076 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2121713520 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2149068692 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2231762801 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2307721740 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2493564068 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2557101287 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2944513148 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3033207967 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3040389404 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3117244885 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3125547775 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3125853408 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3170907101 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3178941628 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W3198045854 @default.
- W2891293794 hasRelatedWork W2105164826 @default.
- W2891293794 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2891293794 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2891293794 magId "2891293794" @default.
- W2891293794 workType "article" @default.