FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891531520> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891531520 endingPage "106" @default.
• W2891531520 startingPage "103" @default.
• W2891531520 abstract "Applicants’ Role as (Pro-)Active Agents in the Recruitment and Selection ProcessA Frequently Overlooked PerspectiveMarise Ph. Born, Annemarie M. F. Hiemstra, and Janneke K. OostromMarise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author, Annemarie M. F. Hiemstra Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author, and Janneke K. Oostrom Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:September 20, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000215PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreReferences Adams, S., Görgens-Ekermans, G. & De Kock, F. (2018). Graduate applicant intentions and behavioral beliefs: The role of protected group status. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000210 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Celani, A. & Singh, P. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111106093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Cook, M. (2016). Personnel selection: Adding value through people – a changing picture (6th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Dürr, D. & Klehe, U.-C. (2018). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict faking in selection exercises varying in fidelity. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000211 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar Farr, J. L.Tippins, N. T. (2017). Handbook of employee selection (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Ilies, R., Wilson, K. S. & Wagner, D. T. (2009). The spillover of daily job satisfaction onto employees’ family lives: The facilitating role of work-family integration. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461938 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C. & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant perspectives during selection: A review addressing “so what?”, “what’s new?”, and “where to next?”. Journal of Management, 43, 1693–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316681846 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Nieva, V. & Gutek, B. (1981). Women and work. New York, NY: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Proost, K. & Verhaest, D. (2018). Should we tell the recruiter that we value a good work–life balance? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000214 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar Roulin, N. & Powell, D. M. (2018). Identifying applicant faking in job interviews: Examining the role of criterion-based content analysis and storytelling. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000207 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90026-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Vrij, A. & Mann, S. (2006). Criteria-based content analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500129007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Wille, L., Van Hoye, G., Weijters, B., Rangarajan, D. & Carpentier, M. (2018). To be yourself or to be your ideal self? Outcomes of potential applicants’ actual and ideal self-congruity perceptions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000213 First citation in articleAbstract, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAI Evaluation in Selection Effects on Application and Pursuit IntentionsAgata Mirowska19 August 2020 | Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 3 Volume 17Issue 3July 2018ISSN: 1866-5888eISSN: 2190-5150 Published onlineSeptember 20, 2018 InformationJournal of Personnel Psychology (2018), 17, pp. 103-106 https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000215.© 2018Hogrefe PublishingPDF download" @default.
• W2891531520 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891531520 creator A5024060936 @default.
• W2891531520 creator A5045673050 @default.
• W2891531520 creator A5061093480 @default.
• W2891531520 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2891531520 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2891531520 title "Applicants’ Role as (Pro-)Active Agents in the Recruitment and Selection Process" @default.
• W2891531520 cites W1775838555 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W1979418493 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2026149024 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2054743331 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2057492893 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2099697766 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2144332559 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2162153512 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2575288116 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2803401699 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2889681796 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2891193447 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2892061200 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W2892280226 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W3044291841 @default.
• W2891531520 cites W3140376885 @default.
• W2891531520 doi "https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000215" @default.
• W2891531520 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891531520 type Work @default.
• W2891531520 sameAs 2891531520 @default.
• W2891531520 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2891531520 countsByYear W28915315202020 @default.
• W2891531520 countsByYear W28915315202021 @default.
• W2891531520 countsByYear W28915315202022 @default.
• W2891531520 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891531520 hasAuthorship W2891531520A5024060936 @default.
• W2891531520 hasAuthorship W2891531520A5045673050 @default.
• W2891531520 hasAuthorship W2891531520A5061093480 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C2779157386 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C52069626 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C154945302 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C15744967 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C161191863 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C2778805511 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C2779157386 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C41008148 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C52069626 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C52119013 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C77805123 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C81917197 @default.
• W2891531520 hasConceptScore W2891531520C95457728 @default.
• W2891531520 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2891531520 hasLocation W28915315201 @default.
• W2891531520 hasOpenAccess W2891531520 @default.
• W2891531520 hasPrimaryLocation W28915315201 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W1496754681 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W1984008941 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2321219623 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2471891399 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2486246151 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2897245327 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W4319588573 @default.
• W2891531520 hasRelatedWork W817567431 @default.
• W2891531520 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2891531520 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891531520 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891531520 magId "2891531520" @default.
• W2891531520 workType "article" @default.