FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891604805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891604805 endingPage "83" @default.
• W2891604805 startingPage "76" @default.
• W2891604805 abstract "Objective Several European countries are implementing organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and/or flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), but the cost-effectiveness of these programmes is not yet available. We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness, based on data from the established Piedmont screening programme. Methods Using the Piedmont programme data, a Markov model was constructed comparing three strategies in a simulated cohort of 100,000 subjects: single FS, biennial FIT, or sequential strategy (FS + FIT offered to FS non-responders). Estimates for CRC incidence and mortality prevention were derived from studies of organized screening. Cost analysis for FS and FIT was based on data from organized programmes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) between the different strategies were calculated. Sensitivity and probabilistic analyses were performed. Results Direct costs for FS, and for FIT at first and subsequent rounds, were estimated as €160, €33, and €21, respectively. All the simulated strategies were effective (10–17% CRC incidence reduction) and cost-effective vs. no screening (ICER <€1000 per life-year saved). FS and FS + FIT were the only cost-saving strategies, with FS least expensive (€15 saving per person invited). FS + FIT and FS were the only non-dominated strategies. FS + FIT were more effective and cost-effective than FS (ICER €1217 per life-year saved). The residual marginal uncertainty was mainly related to parameters inherent to FIT effectiveness and adherence. Conclusions Organized CRC screening programmes are highly cost-effective, irrespective of the test selected. A sequential approach with FS and FIT appears the most cost-effective option. A single FS is the least expensive, but convenient, approach." @default.
• W2891604805 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5005510561 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5010158984 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5045814606 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5048964376 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5060403117 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5061734048 @default.
• W2891604805 creator A5066921477 @default.
• W2891604805 date "2018-09-04" @default.
• W2891604805 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2891604805 title "Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test" @default.
• W2891604805 cites W1974809315 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W1980687370 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W1999789157 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2003533947 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2012717023 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2038710240 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2063036319 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2066194774 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2087147904 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2096911657 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2105313216 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2113414502 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2121010314 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2132679045 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2134756002 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2143305760 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2146233513 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2146900818 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2147579615 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2147901921 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2159609271 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2164862736 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2168083201 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2176049074 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2227467289 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2333627605 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2443966614 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W2590454024 @default.
• W2891604805 cites W4236094563 @default.
• W2891604805 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141318789710" @default.
• W2891604805 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30180780" @default.
• W2891604805 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891604805 type Work @default.
• W2891604805 sameAs 2891604805 @default.
• W2891604805 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2891604805 countsByYear W28916048052019 @default.
• W2891604805 countsByYear W28916048052020 @default.
• W2891604805 countsByYear W28916048052021 @default.
• W2891604805 countsByYear W28916048052022 @default.
• W2891604805 countsByYear W28916048052023 @default.
• W2891604805 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5005510561 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5010158984 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5045814606 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5048964376 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5060403117 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5061734048 @default.
• W2891604805 hasAuthorship W2891604805A5066921477 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C2779896975 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C2993160541 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C105795698 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C112930515 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C121608353 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C126322002 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C144024400 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C149923435 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C151730666 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C2524010 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C2777267654 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C2778435480 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C2779896975 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C2993160541 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C3019080777 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C33923547 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C515549039 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C526805850 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C61511704 @default.
• W2891604805 hasConceptScore W2891604805C71924100 @default.

• next