FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891623922> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891623922 abstract "In certain settings, law sometimes puts listeners first when their First Amendment interests collide with speakers’. And collide they often do. Sometimes speakers prefer to tell lies when their listeners thirst for the truth. Sometimes listeners hope that speakers will reveal their secrets, while those speakers resist disclosure. And at still other times, speakers seek to address certain listeners when those listeners long to be left alone. When speakers’ and listeners’ First Amendment interests collide, whose interests should prevail? Law sometimes – but not always – puts listeners’ interests first in settings outside of public discourse where those listeners have less information or power than speakers. This “listener-centered” approach understands the First Amendment to permit the government to regulate the speech of comparatively knowledgeable or powerful speakers when that expression frustrates their listeners’ autonomy, enlightenment, and self-governance interests – values at the heart of the Free Speech Clause. In this essay, I list a number of ways in which speakers sometimes enjoy advantages of information or power (or both) over their listeners, thus enhancing their ability to deceive or coerce those listeners. I then describe how law can address these inequalities. Law can forbid comparatively knowledgeable or powerful speakers from lying to their listeners, it can require those speakers to make truthful disclosures to their listeners, and it can bar those speakers (as well as the government) from coercing those listeners. As we'll see, First Amendment law sometimes takes a listener-centered approach; this has been the case in commercial and professional speech settings. I suggest that we should extend a listener-centered approach to other communicative relationships of inequality: employers’ speech to workers about the terms and conditions of employment, and service providers’ speech to women seeking reproductive health care. Why put listeners first in environments of expressive inequality? When speakers enjoy certain advantages of information or power over their listeners, they can mislead or muscle their listeners in ways that strike us as unfair and sometimes dangerous. When we take seriously the First Amendment interests of listeners who suffer disadvantages of information or power in these relationships, we improve the quality of the communicative discourse. We also recognize listeners as ends in themselves--rather than as mere means through which speakers seek to achieve their own ends." @default.
• W2891623922 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891623922 creator A5085816599 @default.
• W2891623922 date "2018-08-05" @default.
• W2891623922 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2891623922 title "Powerful Speakers and Their Listeners" @default.
• W2891623922 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891623922 type Work @default.
• W2891623922 sameAs 2891623922 @default.
• W2891623922 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2891623922 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2891623922 hasAuthorship W2891623922A5085816599 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C2776156098 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C121332964 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C138885662 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C15744967 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C163258240 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C17744445 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C199539241 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C2776156098 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C2778137410 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C2778272461 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C2994536602 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C41895202 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C62520636 @default.
• W2891623922 hasConceptScore W2891623922C65414064 @default.
• W2891623922 hasOpenAccess W2891623922 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W1513402825 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W1552248899 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W1983295177 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2013172319 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2022824944 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W214152487 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2257587354 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2287144776 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2375464176 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2584156690 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2792996265 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2894172626 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2897763954 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2911043097 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2964075209 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W2964309931 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W3125601589 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W3185790824 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W321339165 @default.
• W2891623922 hasRelatedWork W76539595 @default.
• W2891623922 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891623922 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891623922 magId "2891623922" @default.
• W2891623922 workType "article" @default.