FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891644242> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891644242 endingPage "122" @default.
• W2891644242 startingPage "118" @default.
• W2891644242 abstract "Valorar la formación de profesionales médicos en comunicación de malas noticias (CMN), y evaluar la utilidad de un taller de videos y debriefing para su enseñanza. Estudio descriptivo de la formación previa, metodología, e importancia de la CMN en estudiantes, residentes y facultativos en Medicina. También se ha realizado un estudio antes-después para evaluar la utilidad de un taller práctico basado en videos de diferentes situaciones con CMN, aplicación del protocolo SPIKES, y posterior debriefing, y una encuesta de satisfacción a los estudiantes de dicho taller. Participaron 135 personas, siendo 102 (75,6%) estudiantes de Medicina. Ciento diecisiete participantes (92,9%) no utilizaban ninguna metodología en CMN, 99 (79,2%) no habían recibido formación en CMN, y 113 (89,7%) no conocían el protocolo SPIKES. Tras el taller, 112 encuestados (85,5%) consideraron muy importante la formación en CMN. Todos los participantes encontraron útil el taller y consideraron que la metodología fue adecuada (3-5 en escala de Likert). Al comparar las evaluaciones, encontramos una media de 5,8 (IC95% 5,6-5,9) pretaller, y de 5,9 (IC95% 5,9-6,0) postaller (p< 0,01). Existe poca formación en la actualidad para la CMN. Su enseñanza debe ser práctica, siendo el modelo de videos un método adecuado. To evaluate the training of medical professionals in Breaking Bad News (BBN), and the usefulness of a workshop based on clinical-case’ videos and debriefing. Descriptive study of previous training, methodology used, and importance of BBN in students, residents and physicians. A before-after study was also performed to evaluate the usefulness of a practical workshop based on videos of different situations with BBN, application of the SPIKES protocol, and subsequent debriefing. A satisfaction survey was answered by all participants. 135 people participated in the workshop, of which 102 (75.6%) were medical students. 117 participants (92.9%) did not use any methodology in BBN, 99 (79.2%) had not received previous training in BBN, and 113 (89.7%) did not know the SPIKES protocol. After the workshop, 112 (85.5%) considered BBN very important. All participants found the workshop useful and considered that the methodology was adequate (3-5 on Likert scale). Comparing the evaluations, we have found an average of 5.8 (95%CI 5.6-5.9) pre-workshop, and 5.9 (95%CI 5.9-6.0) post-workshop (p< 0.01) Currently, training in BBN is poor. Its teaching should be practical, being the video model an appropriate method." @default.
• W2891644242 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891644242 creator A5020128499 @default.
• W2891644242 creator A5034251884 @default.
• W2891644242 creator A5047707078 @default.
• W2891644242 creator A5075136537 @default.
• W2891644242 date "2020-03-01" @default.
• W2891644242 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2891644242 title "¿Comunicamos correctamente las malas noticias en medicina? Resultados de un taller de formación basado en videos y debriefing" @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2016200210 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2109116356 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2147263342 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2201377212 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2258049235 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2544948321 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2582008348 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2614566108 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2621086981 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2621374981 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2730636735 @default.
• W2891644242 cites W2744430279 @default.
• W2891644242 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.07.005" @default.
• W2891644242 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2891644242 type Work @default.
• W2891644242 sameAs 2891644242 @default.
• W2891644242 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2891644242 countsByYear W28916442422021 @default.
• W2891644242 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891644242 hasAuthorship W2891644242A5020128499 @default.
• W2891644242 hasAuthorship W2891644242A5034251884 @default.
• W2891644242 hasAuthorship W2891644242A5047707078 @default.
• W2891644242 hasAuthorship W2891644242A5075136537 @default.
• W2891644242 hasBestOaLocation W28916442421 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConcept C202695956 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConceptScore W2891644242C142362112 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConceptScore W2891644242C15708023 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConceptScore W2891644242C15744967 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConceptScore W2891644242C202695956 @default.
• W2891644242 hasConceptScore W2891644242C77805123 @default.
• W2891644242 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2891644242 hasLocation W28916442421 @default.
• W2891644242 hasOpenAccess W2891644242 @default.
• W2891644242 hasPrimaryLocation W28916442421 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W1557907936 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2111865594 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2248387313 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2944012422 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W2987111374 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W3120330463 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W3203105381 @default.
• W2891644242 hasRelatedWork W1934311404 @default.
• W2891644242 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2891644242 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891644242 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891644242 magId "2891644242" @default.
• W2891644242 workType "article" @default.