FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891665090> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891665090 endingPage "61" @default.
• W2891665090 startingPage "52" @default.
• W2891665090 abstract "The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of four direct restorative materials that can be used in the proximal box elevation (PBE) technique.Seventy-five molar teeth were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n=15): type II glass ionomer (GI), type II resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), resin-based composite (RBC), bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composite, and a control with no box elevation procedure. Specimens were prepared for a standard mesio-occlusal-distal, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) resin, nanoceramic onlay with mesial cervical margins located 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and distal cervical margins located 2 mm below the CEJ. PBE was used to elevate the distal margins to 1 mm above the CEJ in all groups except the control group. For the control group the onlay margin was placed directly on the prepared distal tooth structure without PBE. A Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM resin, nanoceramic onlay restorative was manufactured and bonded on all specimens with RelyX Ultimate adhesive resin cement. The quality of the tooth-PBE material and PBE material-onlay interface was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy using epoxy resin replicas before and after cyclic loading (100,000 cycles, 1.2 Hz at 65N and 37°C). In addition to margin quality, the fracture resistance of each group was measured using a universal testing machine. Fracture pattern was recorded by visual examination. The Levene test for homogeneity and the Welch analysis of variance were completed for fracture resistance and margin quality. A χ2 test was completed for break mode.For dentin margins, a statistically significant difference was detected between the RMGI and control groups at baseline (p=0.0442). All other groups-GI, RBC, and BF-showed no difference from the control at baseline (p>0.05). No statistical significance was observed among groups for post-cyclic fatigue (p=0.8735). For onlay margins, no statistical significance was observed among groups for pre-cyclic fatigue, post-cyclic fatigue, or change (p=0.9713, p=0.528, p=0.4385, respectively). No significant difference was observed for the fracture resistance among groups or for the type of break by material used (p=0.1593, p=0.77, respectively).Within the parameters of this study, after mechanical fatigue, the materials used for PBE: RMGI, RBC, and BF, did not influence results in terms of margin quality and fracture resistance. Therefore, collective findings suggest that these materials might be suitable for PBE procedures. Nevertheless, clinical caution is recommended with any PBE procedure and further testing of GI materials is needed." @default.
• W2891665090 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891665090 creator A5041880629 @default.
• W2891665090 creator A5047742977 @default.
• W2891665090 creator A5067799499 @default.
• W2891665090 creator A5091419051 @default.
• W2891665090 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2891665090 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2891665090 title "Efficacy of Direct Restorative Materials in Proximal Box Elevation on the Margin Quality and Fracture Resistance of Molars Restored With CAD/CAM Onlays" @default.
• W2891665090 cites W1964739896 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W1986627971 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2006458069 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2018466722 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2027368707 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2044227190 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2046122881 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2056682842 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2072864030 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2095565985 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2103791808 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2105011080 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2138676621 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2155537314 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2276440842 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2295922763 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2337959118 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2518221689 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2524883787 @default.
• W2891665090 cites W2765650343 @default.
• W2891665090 doi "https://doi.org/10.2341/18-098-l" @default.
• W2891665090 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31084532" @default.
• W2891665090 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2891665090 type Work @default.
• W2891665090 sameAs 2891665090 @default.
• W2891665090 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2891665090 countsByYear W28916650902020 @default.
• W2891665090 countsByYear W28916650902021 @default.
• W2891665090 countsByYear W28916650902022 @default.
• W2891665090 countsByYear W28916650902023 @default.
• W2891665090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891665090 hasAuthorship W2891665090A5041880629 @default.
• W2891665090 hasAuthorship W2891665090A5047742977 @default.
• W2891665090 hasAuthorship W2891665090A5067799499 @default.
• W2891665090 hasAuthorship W2891665090A5091419051 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C155977592 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C2776313386 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C2777486477 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C51936186 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConcept C79584836 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C112950240 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C134132462 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C155977592 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C159985019 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C180478085 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C192562407 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C199343813 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C202271784 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C2524010 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C2776313386 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C2777486477 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C2779227376 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C33923547 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C51936186 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C68928338 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C71924100 @default.
• W2891665090 hasConceptScore W2891665090C79584836 @default.
• W2891665090 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2891665090 hasLocation W28916650901 @default.
• W2891665090 hasLocation W28916650902 @default.
• W2891665090 hasOpenAccess W2891665090 @default.
• W2891665090 hasPrimaryLocation W28916650901 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2101544552 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2193444318 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2740685123 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2757952500 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2889467900 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2891665090 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W2917739437 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W4210577297 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W4221005669 @default.
• W2891665090 hasRelatedWork W4285205344 @default.
• W2891665090 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2891665090 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891665090 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891665090 magId "2891665090" @default.
• W2891665090 workType "article" @default.