FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891734047> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891734047 endingPage "283" @default.
• W2891734047 startingPage "278" @default.
• W2891734047 abstract "Accessible Summary The authors aimed to find out whether staff found team formulation helpful and whether staff felt it changed their work with service users. Twenty‐eight staff members working on the assessment and treatment unit were asked to complete a questionnaire about team formulation. Most staff found formulation meetings to be helpful (80%) and felt that formulation meetings improved how they work with service users (86%). These findings suggest team formulation may improve staff approach and the care and support service users receive in hospital. Abstract Background Research suggests that the use of team formulation within mental health services may improve staff understanding of service users’ difficulties and increase team empathy and reflection. The aim of this evaluation was to investigate staff perceptions of team formulation within an assessment and treatment unit for individuals with learning disabilities. Specifically, the authors aimed to investigate whether staff found team formulation helpful and whether staff felt it impacted their work with service users. Materials and Methods A survey was completed using a cross‐sectional questionnaire design. Twenty‐eight staff members working on the assessment and treatment unit were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire about team formulation meetings. Results The response rate was 54%. The majority of staff agreed that they found formulation meetings to be helpful (80%) and that formulation meetings positively impacted how they work with service users (86%). The most common theme arising from staff responses concerning the most helpful aspects of formulation meetings was “gaining a greater understanding of service users.” Conclusions The findings from this evaluation show that the majority of respondents felt team formulation was helpful and had a positive impact on their work with service users. These findings support the use of team formulation within mental health and learning disabilities services. Future research could investigate the impact of team formulation on service user well‐being and outcomes." @default.
• W2891734047 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891734047 creator A5069086732 @default.
• W2891734047 creator A5070430345 @default.
• W2891734047 creator A5084824835 @default.
• W2891734047 date "2018-09-14" @default.
• W2891734047 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2891734047 title "Team formulation in an assessment and treatment unit for individuals with learning disabilities: An evaluation through staff views" @default.
• W2891734047 cites W2042010677 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W2298592143 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W2322867541 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W4315746082 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W4315828393 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W4316074675 @default.
• W2891734047 cites W4316083226 @default.
• W2891734047 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12249" @default.
• W2891734047 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891734047 type Work @default.
• W2891734047 sameAs 2891734047 @default.
• W2891734047 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2891734047 countsByYear W28917340472020 @default.
• W2891734047 countsByYear W28917340472021 @default.
• W2891734047 countsByYear W28917340472022 @default.
• W2891734047 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891734047 hasAuthorship W2891734047A5069086732 @default.
• W2891734047 hasAuthorship W2891734047A5070430345 @default.
• W2891734047 hasAuthorship W2891734047A5084824835 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C122637931 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C2779885105 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C118552586 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C122637931 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C127413603 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C136264566 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C145420912 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C15744967 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C159110408 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C162324750 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C18762648 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C2779885105 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C2780378061 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C509550671 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C71924100 @default.
• W2891734047 hasConceptScore W2891734047C78519656 @default.
• W2891734047 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2891734047 hasLocation W28917340471 @default.
• W2891734047 hasOpenAccess W2891734047 @default.
• W2891734047 hasPrimaryLocation W28917340471 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W1998814105 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2014447469 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2047588198 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2064101415 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2122241274 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W3096606247 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W3097045047 @default.
• W2891734047 hasRelatedWork W4293101880 @default.
• W2891734047 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W2891734047 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891734047 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891734047 magId "2891734047" @default.
• W2891734047 workType "article" @default.