FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891802875> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891802875 endingPage "875" @default.
• W2891802875 startingPage "867" @default.
• W2891802875 abstract "BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported that deep neuromuscular block (posttetanic-count 1 to 2 twitches) improves surgical conditions during laparoscopy compared with moderate block (train-of-four count: 1 to 2 twitches). However, comparisons of surgical conditions were made using different scales and assessment intervals with variable results. OBJECTIVE To explore the heterogeneity of previous comparisons between deep and moderate neuromuscular block. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Our meta-analysis included RCTs comparing the effects of deep with moderate neuromuscular block on surgical field conditions during laparoscopic surgery. The frequency of excellent or good operating conditions on a surgical rating scale was compared. Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analyses. RESULTS Eleven RCTs involving 844 patients were included. On the surgical rating scale, the frequency of excellent or good operating conditions was higher with deep block compared with a moderate block (odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 5.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 59%). We analysed surgical rating according to the number of assessments made. There was a significant difference in surgical rating with multiple assessments, but no difference when the assessment was made on only one occasion. A significant difference in rating was noted with variable abdominal pressures; there was no significant difference with the same fixed abdominal pressure. Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the cumulative z-curve crossed the O′Brien–Fleming significance boundary. However, required information size was not achieved. CONCLUSION Deep block was associated with excellent or good surgical rating more frequently than moderate block. However, this finding was not consistent on subgroup analyses based on frequencies of assessment of surgical conditions and abdominal pressure. Further studies are required to address the heterogeneity and power shortage demonstrated by the trial sequential analysis." @default.
• W2891802875 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5003714860 @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5034096832 @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5041977459 @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5059098941 @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5078726076 @default.
• W2891802875 creator A5089456278 @default.
• W2891802875 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2891802875 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2891802875 title "Deep vs. moderate neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic surgery" @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1570147260 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1765950476 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1907670313 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1971441597 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1972554042 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1976255430 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1990300043 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1999831583 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W1999949798 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2010737884 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2037323031 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2048667444 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2056978006 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2082753953 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2100786429 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2126930838 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2150684786 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2290477754 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2326171022 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2383698556 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2460060435 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2507324036 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2560031487 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2572037312 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2587973800 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2594680431 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2621142169 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2763361960 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2766169827 @default.
• W2891802875 cites W2991792334 @default.
• W2891802875 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000884" @default.
• W2891802875 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30188357" @default.
• W2891802875 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891802875 type Work @default.
• W2891802875 sameAs 2891802875 @default.
• W2891802875 citedByCount "39" @default.
• W2891802875 countsByYear W28918028752019 @default.
• W2891802875 countsByYear W28918028752020 @default.
• W2891802875 countsByYear W28918028752021 @default.
• W2891802875 countsByYear W28918028752022 @default.
• W2891802875 countsByYear W28918028752023 @default.
• W2891802875 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5003714860 @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5034096832 @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5041977459 @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5059098941 @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5078726076 @default.
• W2891802875 hasAuthorship W2891802875A5089456278 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C2777210771 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C2909465803 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C105795698 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C126322002 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C141071460 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C156957248 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C168563851 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C17744445 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C187960798 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C199539241 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C2524010 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C2777210771 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C2779473830 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C2780047204 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C2909465803 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C33923547 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C42219234 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C44249647 @default.
• W2891802875 hasConceptScore W2891802875C71924100 @default.

• next