FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891921227> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891921227 abstract "A Review of:&#x0D; Stvilia, B., & Gibradze, L. (2017). Examining undergraduate students' priorities for academic library services and social media communication. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(3), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.02.013&#x0D; Abstract&#x0D; Objective – To examine how undergraduate students rate the importance of different categories of library services and library social media postings.&#x0D; Design – Online survey.&#x0D; Setting – Large research university in the United States.&#x0D; Subjects – 159 undergraduate students enrolled in 3 information technology classes.&#x0D; Methods – Participants were asked to rate the importance of different library service categories on a 7-point Likert scale. The library service categories were (1) access to information and computer resources, (2) study support services, (3) support for club meetings, and (4) Q&A services. Participants were also asked to rate the importance of nine different categories of library social media postings, also on a 7-point Likert scale. The categories of social media postings were (1) event, (2) resources, (3) community building, (4) operations updates, (5) study support, (6) Q&A, (7) survey, (8) staff, and (9) club. Students were also asked to identify which library services they currently use.&#x0D; Main Results – Validly submitted surveys totaled 104 (response rate 65%). Respondents rated access to information and computer resources (M=5.9) and study support services (M=5.9) as being of the highest importance, with no statistically significant difference being found between these ratings. Respondents rated Q&A services (mean not reported) and support for club meetings (M=4.8) as being of significantly lower importance than the baseline (access information and computer resources). In terms of service usage, using the library to study (87%) and to access information and computer resources (59%), were the top two most reportedly used services.&#x0D; Respondents rated social media postings relating to operations updates (M=5.6), study support (M=5.5) and events (M=5.4) as being of highest importance, with no significant difference between the ratings of these three categories. Respondents rated all other categories of social media postings (survey, M=4.7; staff, M=4.4; means for remaining categories not reported) as being of significantly less importance than the baseline (operations updates). For just over half the social media posting categories (5/9, 56%) importance rankings found in this study agree with engagement rankings the authors found in a previous study (Stvilia & Gibradze, 2014).&#x0D; Conclusion – The results of this study suggested frequency of use alone cannot be used to determine the value students place on a library’s services, as students may perceive equal value in services they use at different frequencies. The authors, therefore, argued there is a strong need to inexpensively predict users’ perceptions of service value without relying on usage metrics alone. Because a level of agreement was found between social media engagement (determined in the authors’ 2014 study) and importance rankings (found in this study), the authors proposed further research be done to determine whether and how an analysis of library social media engagement can be used as an inexpensive way to predict the perceived importance and value of a library’s services. While the authors recognized it may not be appropriate to generalize the results of this study to a wider student population, they suggested the findings may be applicable to similar groups of students (i.e., undergraduate information technology students)." @default.
• W2891921227 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891921227 creator A5023895459 @default.
• W2891921227 date "2018-09-13" @default.
• W2891921227 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2891921227 title "Valued Academic Library Services Are Not Necessarily the Ones That Are Used Most Frequently, Students’ Service and Social Media Communication Priorities Should Also Be Considered" @default.
• W2891921227 doi "https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29463" @default.
• W2891921227 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2891921227 type Work @default.
• W2891921227 sameAs 2891921227 @default.
• W2891921227 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2891921227 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891921227 hasAuthorship W2891921227A5023895459 @default.
• W2891921227 hasBestOaLocation W28919212271 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C2776459890 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C105702510 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C105776082 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C121332964 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C136764020 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C138496976 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C144133560 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C15744967 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C161191863 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C162853370 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C2524010 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C2776459890 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C2778755073 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C2780378061 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C28719098 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C33923547 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C41008148 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C509550671 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C518677369 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C62520636 @default.
• W2891921227 hasConceptScore W2891921227C71924100 @default.
• W2891921227 hasLocation W28919212271 @default.
• W2891921227 hasOpenAccess W2891921227 @default.
• W2891921227 hasPrimaryLocation W28919212271 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2049834027 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2052316347 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2069071700 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2161037700 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2230617579 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2609487358 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W2795993930 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W3000300195 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W4226069996 @default.
• W2891921227 hasRelatedWork W4285813452 @default.
• W2891921227 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891921227 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891921227 magId "2891921227" @default.
• W2891921227 workType "article" @default.