FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891929874> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891929874 endingPage "155" @default.
• W2891929874 startingPage "138" @default.
• W2891929874 abstract "Purpose Perceived brand entitativity, or the extent to which a collection of brands signifies a group to consumers, differentiates luxury vs non-luxury brands such that luxury brands are perceived to be more entitative than non-luxury brands. Framed by the concept of brand entitativity and the implicit theory, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether this difference in the perceived brand entitativity of luxury and non-luxury brands impacts how consumers respond to sweatshop allegations in context to these brands. Design/methodology/approach Two separate experimental studies employing between-subjects designs were conducted among a total of 162 and 276 student consumers from a Southern university of the USA. The authors operationalized sweatshop allegations at two levels, brand-specific allegations (the stimulus brand itself is accused) and industry-specific allegations (other brands of the same industry are accused) to examine the role that brand entitativity plays in these two types of allegations. Findings Experiment 1 demonstrated that industry-specific allegations hurt consumer attitudes for luxury brands to a greater extent than non-luxury brands, whereas brand-specific allegations hurt non-luxury brands more so than luxury ones. In experiment 2, the authors find that the above results hold true only for consumers who are more prone to social perceptions of entitativity (entity theorists), but not those who represent an incremental mindset (incremental theorists). Practical implications The results can help brand managers understand the negative downstream consequences of brand- and industry-specific allegations for their brand type (luxury vs non-luxury). Originality/value This study fills an important gap in understanding consumer reaction to brands’ sweatshop allegations by addressing the role of consumers’ perceived brand entitativity and how it differs for consumers holding different implicit beliefs." @default.
• W2891929874 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891929874 creator A5024553441 @default.
• W2891929874 creator A5041631515 @default.
• W2891929874 date "2019-03-11" @default.
• W2891929874 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2891929874 title "Do consumers react differently to sweatshop allegations on luxury and non-luxury brands? A brand entitativity-based account" @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1751238416 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1838839896 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1950302394 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1965663962 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1972199289 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1989999669 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1992688866 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1995142053 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1995307963 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W1996894553 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2001273999 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2023483378 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2033524266 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2047984683 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2068265912 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2076300620 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2089006268 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2089942068 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2099583435 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2128620896 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2131808999 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2136216933 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2143892618 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2150908140 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2151333722 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2167884222 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W2520883499 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W3123645602 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4232476263 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4236213745 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4245647375 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4245765010 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4246370034 @default.
• W2891929874 cites W4250814330 @default.
• W2891929874 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-12-2017-0139" @default.
• W2891929874 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2891929874 type Work @default.
• W2891929874 sameAs 2891929874 @default.
• W2891929874 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2891929874 countsByYear W28919298742020 @default.
• W2891929874 countsByYear W28919298742021 @default.
• W2891929874 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891929874 hasAuthorship W2891929874A5024553441 @default.
• W2891929874 hasAuthorship W2891929874A5041631515 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C136006765 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C153083717 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C205971072 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C2776950860 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C2778295318 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C2778491294 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C57375061 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConcept C9354725 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C11012388 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C111472728 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C112698675 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C119857082 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C136006765 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C138885662 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C144133560 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C153083717 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C15744967 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C162324750 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C162853370 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C169760540 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C205971072 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C26760741 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C2776950860 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C2778295318 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C2778491294 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C34447519 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C41008148 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C57375061 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C77805123 @default.
• W2891929874 hasConceptScore W2891929874C9354725 @default.
• W2891929874 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2891929874 hasLocation W28919298741 @default.
• W2891929874 hasOpenAccess W2891929874 @default.

• next