FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891951288> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891951288 abstract "There has been a continual debate in the science education literature for at least the last 100 years over the value of engaging pupils in practical, laboratory-type activities (Jenkins, 1989; Layton, 1973 and 1991). An integral part of this debate is the ongoing controversy over first, the extent to which pupils’ explorations with materials leads to an increase in their understanding of scientific knowledge, and second, how this learning might occur. In this chapter I shall use the term ‘practical work’ to refer to a broad range of educational practices involving these explorations with materials. This range includes both general, instructional approaches and more specific teaching practices. Examples of the former would be the materialsbased, instructional approaches in the primary grades (for example, the Elementary Science Study in North America and Nuffield Junior Science in England) or the laboratory-based activities in the secondary grades (Fensham, 1990). An example of the latter is the development of specific instruments to assess pupils’ ‘practical’ knowledge and skills (Champagne and Newell, 1992; Giddings, Hofstein and Lunetta, 1991; and Kulm and Malcolm, 1991). While some have argued that engaging pupils in activities involving materials provides a basis for developing pupils’ understanding of the so-called science ‘process skills’ (Wray, 1987), others have claimed that it provides the context in which pupils are able to construct a better understanding of scientific content (Brook, Driver and Johnston, 1989; Gunstone, 1991; White, 1988). I would submit that much of the substance of the contemporary debate regarding practical work and pupil outcomes can be summarized in terms of two general issues, expressed as questions. These are: (i) What is the nature of the relationship between pupils’ understanding of science and their engagement in practical work? and (ii) Can we develop better or more ‘authentic’ (Wiggins, 1989) methods of assessing pupils’ understanding of science? While I will primarily be addressing the first of these questions in this chapter, the data that I will be using to illuminate some of the issues associated with this question comes from a project designed to address the second question." @default.
• W2891951288 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891951288 creator A5090497668 @default.
• W2891951288 date "2013-11-26" @default.
• W2891951288 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2891951288 title "Pupils’ Understanding Magnetism in a Practical Assessment Context: The Relationship Between Content, Process and Progression" @default.
• W2891951288 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831558-11" @default.
• W2891951288 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2891951288 type Work @default.
• W2891951288 sameAs 2891951288 @default.
• W2891951288 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2891951288 countsByYear W28919512882012 @default.
• W2891951288 countsByYear W28919512882013 @default.
• W2891951288 countsByYear W28919512882014 @default.
• W2891951288 countsByYear W28919512882018 @default.
• W2891951288 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2891951288 hasAuthorship W2891951288A5090497668 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConcept C44877443 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C145420912 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C15744967 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C166957645 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C19417346 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C199360897 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C205649164 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C2779343474 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C2780801425 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C41008148 @default.
• W2891951288 hasConceptScore W2891951288C44877443 @default.
• W2891951288 hasLocation W28919512881 @default.
• W2891951288 hasOpenAccess W2891951288 @default.
• W2891951288 hasPrimaryLocation W28919512881 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W120679090 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W1544915392 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W1576956062 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W1969379996 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W1992500185 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2004435555 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2083845368 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2301404517 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2463335036 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2489844810 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2587470182 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W277735212 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2915461072 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2936242394 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W3105220695 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W56093121 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W851126439 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W93041871 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2176365148 @default.
• W2891951288 hasRelatedWork W2917484392 @default.
• W2891951288 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2891951288 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2891951288 magId "2891951288" @default.
• W2891951288 workType "book-chapter" @default.