FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2891983150> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2891983150 endingPage "754" @default.
• W2891983150 startingPage "744" @default.
• W2891983150 abstract "Background Growing rod constructs are an important contribution in the treatment of children with early onset scoliosis even though these devices experience high rates of rod fracture. The mechanical performance of traditional, distraction-based dual growing rod constructs is not well understood, and mechanical models for predicting device performance are limited. Purpose Two mechanical models were developed and used to determine the mechanical performance of various growing rod configurations by increasing construct complexity. Study Design/Setting Mechanical bench testing and finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Static and dynamic compression bending tests were based on an ASTM F1717 method modified to accommodate dual growing rod constructs. Six construct configurations were tested, mechanical properties were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed to determine significant differences between groups: (1) no connectors (rods only), (2) side-by-side connectors, (3) side-by-side connectors plus 4 crosslinks, (4) (40-mm long tandem connectors, (5) 80-mm long tandem connectors, and (6) 80-mm long tandem connectors plus 4 crosslinks. FE analysis was used to predict the stress distribution within the constructs. Results The static results indicated greater stiffness, yield load, and peak load as the axial connector length increased (side-by-side to 40 mm tandem to 80 mm tandem). The dynamic results showed similar cycles to failure for side-by-side and tandem connector (40 and 80 mm) construct configurations without crosslinks. Crosslinks shifted the location of rod fracture observed experimentally and significantly reduced the fatigue life of the construct. The flexibility of the construct decreased significantly as the axial connector length increased. FE predictions were highly consistent with the experimentally measured values and provided information on stress distribution within the rod for comparison to experimental fracture locations. Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate mechanical performance of various configurations of pediatric growing rod constructs using preclinical models. The current study is consistent with a previous retrieval study in that rigid constructs lacking flexibility (ie, higher stiffness and lower displacement), such as those with 80-mm tandem connectors and multiple crosslinks, demonstrated decreased mechanical performance as shown through both experimental and computational models. Additionally, the experimental and computational findings suggest that surgeons should strategically consider the number of interconnecting components and subsequent stress concentrations along the posterior side of the rod. For example, changing the placement of crosslinks to low stress regions of the construct or not using crosslinks in the construct are options." @default.
• W2891983150 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5031592291 @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5033657808 @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5054625823 @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5056415804 @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5066220277 @default.
• W2891983150 creator A5086781464 @default.
• W2891983150 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2891983150 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2891983150 title "Mechanical performance of traditional distraction-based dual growing rod constructs" @default.
• W2891983150 cites W184787372 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1964330840 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1969467163 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1970138382 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1975201653 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1975292783 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1979946962 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1996213402 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W1996815975 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2000358356 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2010434414 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2021186245 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2028063412 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2060599617 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2071011014 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2087650866 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2323067424 @default.
• W2891983150 cites W2609843016 @default.
• W2891983150 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.006" @default.
• W2891983150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30219359" @default.
• W2891983150 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2891983150 type Work @default.
• W2891983150 sameAs 2891983150 @default.
• W2891983150 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2891983150 countsByYear W28919831502020 @default.
• W2891983150 countsByYear W28919831502021 @default.
• W2891983150 countsByYear W28919831502022 @default.
• W2891983150 countsByYear W28919831502023 @default.
• W2891983150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5031592291 @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5033657808 @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5054625823 @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5056415804 @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5066220277 @default.
• W2891983150 hasAuthorship W2891983150A5086781464 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C110925319 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C180016635 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C21036866 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C2777814067 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConcept C87210426 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C105795698 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C110925319 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C127413603 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C138885662 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C159985019 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C180016635 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C192562407 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C21036866 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C2777814067 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C2779372316 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C2780598303 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C29694066 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C33923547 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C41895202 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C66938386 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C71924100 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C78519656 @default.
• W2891983150 hasConceptScore W2891983150C87210426 @default.
• W2891983150 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2891983150 hasLocation W28919831501 @default.
• W2891983150 hasLocation W28919831502 @default.
• W2891983150 hasOpenAccess W2891983150 @default.
• W2891983150 hasPrimaryLocation W28919831501 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W1439781492 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W1974475689 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W1976360145 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W1980800176 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W2371131898 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W2517372751 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W2581034425 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W3003793955 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W4253461375 @default.
• W2891983150 hasRelatedWork W4321614233 @default.
• W2891983150 hasVolume "19" @default.

• next