FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892007473> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892007473 endingPage "175" @default.
• W2892007473 startingPage "151" @default.
• W2892007473 abstract "This paper aims to defend what could be called the current theory of indexicals, and more specifically the first and second person pronouns, against a peculiar type of counter-examples which might be invoked against it. Very roughly, the current theory of indexicals (based on Kaplan 1977) says that I or you are interpreted not through a conceptual “description” which would be lexically linked to them (i.e. would be their semantic content), such as the speaker or the adressee of the present utterance, but rather through a specific procedure, lexically linked to them, such as look for the speaker or look for the adressee. These procedures would be their (non-conceptual and non-descriptive) semantic content. This analysis means that any utterance where an indexical occurs and where it is ambiguous as to whom the indexical refers to may be used as a counter-example if certain conditions are realised: the analysis of indexicals being what it is, if the situation is clearly perceived (i.e. if it is clear who is the speaker and who is the adressee), it should not be possible for an indexical to be ambiguous. Thus, authentic examples of ambiguity in indexicals are ipso facto counter-examples to the current theory of indexicals. I will first distinguish between mere misunderstandings and what appear to be authentic examples of ambiguity, such as the title of this paper (If I were you, I wouldn't trust myself). I will show that these examples mainly occur in the consequents of counterfactuals whose antecedents are identity statements (where indexicals occur) and show the proximity between these counterfactuals and counteridenticals. I then will show that the antecedents are used non-literally and that the “ambiguity” of the indexicals in the consequents comes from the difficulty of choosing which specific implication the speaker intended the hearer to recover. Thus, the so-called ambiguity of indexicals in the consequent of such counterfactuals reduces to a misunderstanding as to the description of the situation to which the procedure attached to the indexicals should be applied." @default.
• W2892007473 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892007473 creator A5033284416 @default.
• W2892007473 date "1996-03-28" @default.
• W2892007473 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2892007473 title "If I were you, I wouldn't trust myself" @default.
• W2892007473 cites W1516748551 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W1571895365 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W1969787028 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W2007788667 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W2162550621 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W2326105238 @default.
• W2892007473 cites W2413414523 @default.
• W2892007473 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2892007473 type Work @default.
• W2892007473 sameAs 2892007473 @default.
• W2892007473 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2892007473 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892007473 hasAuthorship W2892007473A5033284416 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C108650721 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C150104678 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C189950617 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C2775852435 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C2777152325 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C71889745 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConcept C99377836 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C108650721 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C111472728 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C138885662 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C150104678 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C189950617 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C2775852435 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C2777152325 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C2780522230 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C41895202 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C71889745 @default.
• W2892007473 hasConceptScore W2892007473C99377836 @default.
• W2892007473 hasLocation W28920074731 @default.
• W2892007473 hasOpenAccess W2892007473 @default.
• W2892007473 hasPrimaryLocation W28920074731 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W111466759 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W1587546339 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W1977165236 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2034544974 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2042125373 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2052393434 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2056661687 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2079357995 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2096803404 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2133058939 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2135417933 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2169333291 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2256732562 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2322561600 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2334020148 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2470460005 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2925179373 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W75401185 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W770209116 @default.
• W2892007473 hasRelatedWork W2434501746 @default.
• W2892007473 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892007473 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892007473 magId "2892007473" @default.
• W2892007473 workType "article" @default.