FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892021161> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892021161 endingPage "2215" @default.
• W2892021161 startingPage "2190" @default.
• W2892021161 abstract "Background Psychosocial factors are key determinants of health after upper extremity injuries. However, a systematic review is needed to understand which psychosocial factors are most consistently associated with disability and how the language, conceptualization, and types of measures used to assess disability impact these associations in upper extremity injuries. Questions/purposes (1) What factors are most consistently associated with disability after upper extremity injuries in adults? (2) What are the trends in types of outcome measures and conceptualization of disability in patients’ upper extremity injuries? Methods We searched multiple electronic databases (PubMED, OVIDSP, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science) between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2016, using terms related to the “upper extremity”, “outcome measurement”, and “impairment, psychological, social or symptomatic” variables. We included all studies involving adult patients with any musculoskeletal injury and excluded those that did not use patient-reported outcome measures. We identified and screened 9339 studies. Of these, we retained 41 studies that involved conditions ranging from fractures to soft tissue injuries in various regions of the arm. We conducted quality assessment using a 10-item validated checklist and a five-tier strength of evidence assessment. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria and registered the review before performing our search (PROSPERO: CRD42017054048). None of the authors received any funding to perform this work. Results Disability after upper extremity injury was most consistently associated with depression (21 cohorts), catastrophic thinking (13 cohorts), anxiety (11 cohorts), pain self-efficacy (eight cohorts), and pain interference (seven cohorts). Social and demographic factors were also associated with disability. Measures of impairment such as ROM and injury severity were least associated with disability. There has been a gradual increase in use of region or condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures and measures of psychological, social, and symptomatic factors over a period since the introduction of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) around 2000. Approximately 17% of studies (n = 454 of 2628) had instances of unclear, conflicting, or inappropriate terminology and 11% of studies (n = 257 of 2628) involved misrepresentations of outcome measures related to disability. Conclusions Psychologic and social factors are most consistently associated with disability than factors related to impairment. Further research involving the assessment of depression, anxiety, and coping strategies in cohorts with specific injuries may support decision-making regarding the provision of emotional support and psychologic therapies during recovery. Using the WHO ICF framework to conceptualize disability is key in increasing strength of evidence and allowing accurate comparisons of research in this field. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study." @default.
• W2892021161 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5000497890 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5011496424 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5013496783 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5029244642 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5033096984 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5036922202 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5068995535 @default.
• W2892021161 creator A5069994416 @default.
• W2892021161 date "2018-09-05" @default.
• W2892021161 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2892021161 title "What Factors Are Associated With Disability After Upper Extremity Injuries? A Systematic Review" @default.
• W2892021161 cites W1965977652 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W1985131992 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W1989566782 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W1994045717 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W1994526109 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2001391732 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2004119480 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2008693222 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2012486267 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2027013776 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2032527834 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2034288969 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2043545865 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2044084101 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2045422175 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2051855385 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2053993519 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2058622254 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2061380458 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2062344108 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2064315761 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2068717117 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2070033001 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2070125771 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2072988251 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2073437504 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2076805274 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2077694793 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2092016732 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2094501331 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2099639398 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2102200177 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2111293072 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2112219170 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2118236229 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2120532095 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2121534797 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2128593891 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2139209101 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2142474311 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2145622148 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2146096202 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2150804206 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2155145775 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2156804719 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2157860211 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2160948831 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2165996121 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2168786637 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2169206722 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2198719807 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2259319152 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2338379519 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2342639678 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W2387512683 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W246286872 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2892021161 cites W854187735 @default.
• W2892021161 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000000427" @default.
• W2892021161 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6259989" @default.
• W2892021161 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30188344" @default.
• W2892021161 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892021161 type Work @default.
• W2892021161 sameAs 2892021161 @default.
• W2892021161 citedByCount "82" @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612018 @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612019 @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612020 @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612021 @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612022 @default.
• W2892021161 countsByYear W28920211612023 @default.
• W2892021161 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5000497890 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5011496424 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5013496783 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5029244642 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5033096984 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5036922202 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5068995535 @default.
• W2892021161 hasAuthorship W2892021161A5069994416 @default.
• W2892021161 hasBestOaLocation W28920211611 @default.
• W2892021161 hasConcept C115219716 @default.
• W2892021161 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2892021161 hasConcept C150966472 @default.

• next