FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892026666> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892026666 abstract "Abstract Background Several studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy, but no randomized, controlled trial has confirmed the efficacy of the triangulating stapling method for cervical esophagogastrostomy. We compared triangulating stapling and circular stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis regarding the decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods Between August 2010 and April 2014, 100 patients enrolled in this randomized, controlled trial at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital were allocated randomly to either the circular stapling group (n = 49) or the triangulating stapling group (n = 51). The primary end point was the incidence of anastomotic stricture within 12 months postoperatively. This randomized, controlled trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000004848). Results There were no differences between the circular stapling and triangulating stapling groups in terms of clinical data. The amount of time required for esophagogastric anastomosis was slightly greater for the triangulating stapling group (22 minutes) than for the circular stapling group (18 minutes) (P = .028). Anastomotic stricture occurred in 8 patients (17%) in the circular stapling group and 9 patients (19%) in the triangulating stapling group (P = .935). The rate of anastomotic leakage was 11% for the circular stapling group and 2% for the triangulating stapling group (P = .073). Conclusion This RCT compared 2 techniques of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study is the first to compare these 2 methods in a randomized, controlled fashion.This study could not show that the triangulating stapling method was superior to the circular stapling method for cervical esophagogastrostomy to reduce anastomotic stricture. The triangulating stapling method, however, might have the potential to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage; a large-scale RCT will be required to assess this question. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest." @default.
• W2892026666 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5013419903 @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5024220180 @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5035411012 @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5053066818 @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5063129930 @default.
• W2892026666 creator A5073275097 @default.
• W2892026666 date "2018-09-01" @default.
• W2892026666 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2892026666 title "PS01.199: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CIRCULAR STAPLING VERSUS TRIANGULATING STAPLING ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER" @default.
• W2892026666 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy089.ps01.199" @default.
• W2892026666 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892026666 type Work @default.
• W2892026666 sameAs 2892026666 @default.
• W2892026666 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2892026666 countsByYear W28920266662019 @default.
• W2892026666 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5013419903 @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5024220180 @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5035411012 @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5053066818 @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5063129930 @default.
• W2892026666 hasAuthorship W2892026666A5073275097 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C2779742542 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C121608353 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C126322002 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C141071460 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C168563851 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C188816634 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C2779742542 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C71924100 @default.
• W2892026666 hasConceptScore W2892026666C8443397 @default.
• W2892026666 hasLocation W28920266661 @default.
• W2892026666 hasOpenAccess W2892026666 @default.
• W2892026666 hasPrimaryLocation W28920266661 @default.
• W2892026666 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892026666 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892026666 magId "2892026666" @default.
• W2892026666 workType "article" @default.