FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892042564> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892042564 abstract "Abstract Background Treatment of distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers is challenging. The therapy for these cancers mainly consist of (neo)adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy and surgery. There are different surgical approaches possible for these patients: transthoracic esophagectomy with a cervical anastomosis (McKeown) or an intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis). However, there is no evidence which is the preferred approach in terms of oncology, morbidity and quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in the long-term quality of life in patients undergoing McKeown (McK) versus Ivor Lewis (IL) esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center. Methods Consecutive patients after either McK or IL for distal oesophagus, GEJ or proximal gastric carcinoma were asked to fill in EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaires to evaluate quality of life during the period of January 2014 – December 2017. EORTC QLQ-INFO25 quality of life questionnaire was used to evaluate information needs of patients in both groups. All answers with a long follow up (> 1 year) after surgery were analysed. Results In the McK group 62 and in the IL group 110 patients were included. Median follow up was 3 years for McK and 2 years for IL. Median age was 62,4 years. Cognitive functioning was significantly better in the IL group (P = 0.038). Complaints of dyspnoe (P = 0.004) and dysphagia (P = 0.028) were significantly higher in the McK group. Patients after IL had significantly less trouble with eating with others (P = 0.003), trouble with taste (P = 0.032), chocking when swallowing (P = 0.022) and trouble with talking (P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in global health status or physical, role, social or emotional functioning. Furthermore there was no difference in symptoms of nausea, fatigue, pain, discomfort or information scores between McK and IL groups. Conclusion After a follow up of > 1 year no differences in global health status or physical, role, social or emotional functioning scales between McK and IL esophagectomy were found. However, significant differences in some symptom scales and cognitive functioning were observed in favor of IL. These findings should be taken into consideration when deciding between a McK and IL esophagectomy in patients where both procedures are feasible. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest." @default.
• W2892042564 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892042564 creator A5019027181 @default.
• W2892042564 creator A5042040126 @default.
• W2892042564 creator A5058804481 @default.
• W2892042564 creator A5070922178 @default.
• W2892042564 creator A5088129958 @default.
• W2892042564 date "2018-09-01" @default.
• W2892042564 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2892042564 title "PS01.122: LONG-TERM QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER MCKEOWN VERSUS IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY" @default.
• W2892042564 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy089.ps01.122" @default.
• W2892042564 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892042564 type Work @default.
• W2892042564 sameAs 2892042564 @default.
• W2892042564 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2892042564 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892042564 hasAuthorship W2892042564A5019027181 @default.
• W2892042564 hasAuthorship W2892042564A5042040126 @default.
• W2892042564 hasAuthorship W2892042564A5058804481 @default.
• W2892042564 hasAuthorship W2892042564A5070922178 @default.
• W2892042564 hasAuthorship W2892042564A5088129958 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C2777297899 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C2779742542 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C61797465 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C121332964 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C121608353 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C126322002 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C1276947 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C141071460 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C2777297899 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C2779742542 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C61434518 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C61797465 @default.
• W2892042564 hasConceptScore W2892042564C71924100 @default.
• W2892042564 hasLocation W28920425641 @default.
• W2892042564 hasOpenAccess W2892042564 @default.
• W2892042564 hasPrimaryLocation W28920425641 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2137211710 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2199882512 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2205730505 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2372725573 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2396410803 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2397514553 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2416535684 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2619126504 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2945989771 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2964593431 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2991090163 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W2991556354 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3000084861 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3011610643 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3026958615 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3029312692 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3030227935 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3030370452 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3182577179 @default.
• W2892042564 hasRelatedWork W3189669289 @default.
• W2892042564 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892042564 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892042564 magId "2892042564" @default.
• W2892042564 workType "article" @default.