FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892072944> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892072944 endingPage "108" @default.
• W2892072944 startingPage "94" @default.
• W2892072944 abstract "Medical and health services concerns the well-being of people. It is fundamental for promoting the construction of China’s people-centered health strategy and realizing the development for the benefit of all. 　　This study proposes a theoretical model of yardstick competition from the top” and discusses the existence of inter-city tactful interaction behaviors in healthcare spending among prefectural-level municipal governments within the framework of a decentralized system. Very often, healthcare spending decisions made by prefectural-level municipal governments are influenced by the relevant strategies of the neighboring cities. Based on the data from 283 prefectural-level cities in China from 2007–2013, and using the dynamic spatial Durbin model (SDM), empirical tests are performed at the prefectural level to investigate the effects of interactions between cities within the same province, as well as the impacts of fiscal decentralization and its spatial tactful interactions in healthcare spending. We conclude that significant strategic interactions exist among municipal governments in government healthcare spending. Furthermore, the strategic interaction of government healthcare spending belongs to complementarities. This indicates that if the adjacent municipal government raises the level of healthcare spending in the same province, the city government's optimal strategy will be to increase the level of government health spending accordingly, with cities characterized by geographical proximity and competing more strongly for government healthcare spending. Moreover, fiscal decentralization seems to drive the supply of government health services, as tactful interactions tend to limit government health spending. This explains why the share of government health spending has been hovering at around 2%. Overall, the implementation of competitive or incentive mechanisms and optimized financial arrangements emerge as a truly effective policy to stimulate the supply of government health services.　　The potential contributions of this paper are as follows. Firstly, in theoretical research, considering welfare maximization decision-making under the restriction of limited resources, this paper develops a top-down” competition model for government healthcare spending between municipal governments using the interaction theory framework. Secondly, the dynamic spatial Durbin model (SDM) is used to solve the path dependence” characteristics of government healthcare spending and to ease the problem of endogeneity. The research conclusion is more accurate after a comprehensive consideration of government healthcare spending over time, space, and time-space lag effects. Thirdly, based on a panel data of 283 prefectural-level cities from 2007–2013, this paper projects a micro and accurate description of the competing behaviors of prefectural-level city governments. Finally, from a research perspective, this paper contributes practical value by examining the strategic interactions in government healthcare spending behaviors, and shows the short- and long-term effects of fiscal decentralization and the strategic competition for space in government healthcare spending." @default.
• W2892072944 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892072944 creator A5043161082 @default.
• W2892072944 creator A5065324986 @default.
• W2892072944 date "2018-06-01" @default.
• W2892072944 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2892072944 title "Competition among Local Governments: Healthcare Expenditure under Fiscal Decentralization" @default.
• W2892072944 doi "https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.06.007" @default.
• W2892072944 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892072944 type Work @default.
• W2892072944 sameAs 2892072944 @default.
• W2892072944 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2892072944 countsByYear W28920729442021 @default.
• W2892072944 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892072944 hasAuthorship W2892072944A5043161082 @default.
• W2892072944 hasAuthorship W2892072944A5065324986 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C136810230 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C2778719706 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C2781356325 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C62908951 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C100001284 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C100243477 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C136810230 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C138885662 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C144133560 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C160735492 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C162324750 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C17744445 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C18903297 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C2778137410 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C2778719706 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C2781356325 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C3116431 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C34447519 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C41895202 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C50522688 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C62908951 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C86803240 @default.
• W2892072944 hasConceptScore W2892072944C91306197 @default.
• W2892072944 hasIssue "06" @default.
• W2892072944 hasLocation W28920729441 @default.
• W2892072944 hasOpenAccess W2892072944 @default.
• W2892072944 hasPrimaryLocation W28920729441 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W1481970679 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W1865041726 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2024544663 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2243117331 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2257791725 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2370186759 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2384529575 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2388835849 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2392429827 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2392682011 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2393236367 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2603308540 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2619051679 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2790817894 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W2915556490 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W3122589259 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W3122891654 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W3123301901 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W3124631441 @default.
• W2892072944 hasRelatedWork W3126017893 @default.
• W2892072944 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2892072944 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892072944 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892072944 magId "2892072944" @default.
• W2892072944 workType "article" @default.