Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892280662> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 items per page.
- W2892280662 abstract "Abstract Background The intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy played important role in minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. The methods of intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis at robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy mostly included hand-sewn, and circular stapler (anvil placement via OrVil system or transthoracically), which were still technically challenging. In this study, we modified the techniques of intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis at robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer, in order to seek to simplify this complicated intrathoracic procedure. Then retrospective comparison between robotic and thoracoscopic cohorts was conducted. Methods We modified techniques focused on the ‘side-insertion’ anvil placement and purse string suture of intrathoracic robot-assisted esophagogastric anastomosis. The consecutive records of patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer via robot-assistant and thoracoscopic procedures in our department between January 2015 and November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Totally 47 patients were enrolled including 20 patients (male: 17, female: 3) in robot-assisted group and 27 patients (male: 21, female: 6) in thoracoscopic group. There was no conversion to open thoracotomy in both two groups. Mean operation duration of robotic group was 412.5 ± 63.5 min, significantly higher than 363.0 ± 53.3 min in thoracoscopic group (P = 0.006). Estimated blood loss in robotic group was less than that in thoracoscopic group (107.5 ± 63.5ml vs. 188.9 ± 94.3ml, respectively, P = 0.002). One patient (5.0%) in robotic group and two patients(7.4%) in thoracoscopic group had anastomotic leak. No postoperative reoperation or mortality (in-hospital or within 30 days after surgery) occurred in both groups. Conclusion Robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was safe and feasible. Our modified procedure highlighting the ‘side-insertion’ method could simplify the process of intrathoracic anvil placement and purse string suture for the robot-assisted esophagogastric anastomosis. Robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was nearly equivalent to thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at short-term outcomes, except higher operation time and less blood loss. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest." @default.
- W2892280662 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5020141736 @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5033764099 @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5060227315 @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5068979363 @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5072085340 @default.
- W2892280662 creator A5079132515 @default.
- W2892280662 date "2018-09-01" @default.
- W2892280662 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2892280662 title "PS01.224: MODIFIED INTRATHORACIC ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY AT MINIMALLY INVASIVE ROBOT-ASSISTED IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER" @default.
- W2892280662 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy089.ps01.224" @default.
- W2892280662 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2892280662 type Work @default.
- W2892280662 sameAs 2892280662 @default.
- W2892280662 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2892280662 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5020141736 @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5033764099 @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5060227315 @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5068979363 @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5072085340 @default.
- W2892280662 hasAuthorship W2892280662A5079132515 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C2777297899 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C2779742542 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C121608353 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C126322002 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C141071460 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C2777297899 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C2779742542 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C61434518 @default.
- W2892280662 hasConceptScore W2892280662C71924100 @default.
- W2892280662 hasLocation W28922806621 @default.
- W2892280662 hasOpenAccess W2892280662 @default.
- W2892280662 hasPrimaryLocation W28922806621 @default.
- W2892280662 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2892280662 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2892280662 magId "2892280662" @default.
- W2892280662 workType "article" @default.