FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892325610> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892325610 endingPage "110" @default.
• W2892325610 startingPage "104" @default.
• W2892325610 abstract "Abstract Objective In this study we aimed to investigate the content and process of contraceptive counseling surrounding combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) methods (combined oral contraceptives, the ring, and the patch). Study design We performed a mixed methods analysis of data collected as part of the Patient-Provider Communication about Contraception study, in which reproductive age women and their providers were recruited at several San Francisco Bay Area clinics from 2009–2012. Participants completed pre- and post-visit surveys, and had their visits audio recorded and transcribed. We performed descriptive and bivariate analyses of the entire cohort to examine associations between demographic characteristics and pre-existing method preferences with method selection and counseling content, and coded transcripts of a subset of the sample for salient themes related to content and process of counseling about combined hormonal contraceptive methods using a directed content analysis approach. Results The overall sample included 342 women, with 152 women (44%) having a preference for a specific CHC prior to their visit, 127 women (37%) had a preference for a non-CHC method, and 63 (18%) having no existing method preference. Of the women who reported preferring a CHC in their pre-visit survey, the majority (72%) chose that method. We found that women were inconsistently counseled about the range of CHC methods. For example, women who had no pre-visit method preference (52%) or who preferred the ring (54%) or the patch (73%) were more likely to receive comprehensive counseling about the three CHC methods than were women who preferred combined oral contraceptives (35%) or non-CHC methods (33%). Providers mentioned the patch the least often, and in qualitative analysis indicated discomfort with prescribing this method. Side effects and benefits of methods, as well as strategies to enhance successful use of the chosen method, were inconsistently discussed. In only 73% of visits in which a woman chose a CHC did the provider assess the patient's ability to use the chosen method correctly, and in 66% of all visits in which women chose a CHC method, providers discussed what to do if she was dissatisfied with the method. Conclusions Counseling about combined hormonal contraceptive methods often does not include information about all available methods, or comprehensive information about side effects, benefits, or logistics of use. As this counseling can impact patient's satisfaction with and continuation of their chosen method of contraception, future work should focus on designing interventions to improve providers' ability to meet patients' needs. Implications Short acting hormonal contraception is widely used, but counseling for these methods often neglects key features. Comprehensive counseling about all methods and their individual features can improve contraceptive selection and use." @default.
• W2892325610 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2892325610 creator A5048364039 @default.
• W2892325610 creator A5048586743 @default.
• W2892325610 creator A5085621414 @default.
• W2892325610 creator A5086537473 @default.
• W2892325610 creator A5089799389 @default.
• W2892325610 date "2019-02-01" @default.
• W2892325610 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2892325610 title "Pill, patch or ring? A mixed methods analysis of provider counseling about combined hormonal contraception" @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1594739284 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1809717525 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1968397374 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1978226409 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1979708349 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1981306710 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1991176741 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1992918532 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W1999849899 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2007583591 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2015523272 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2022458473 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2031546437 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2034297424 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2042221658 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2043221141 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2049525404 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2053062181 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2056629006 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2060267578 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2066838836 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2070924798 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2076495582 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2081492216 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2091481795 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2107308646 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2118006732 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2123229502 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2136067669 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2136679309 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2137309542 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2142225512 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2146264158 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2148639459 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2149638177 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2151755818 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2159000183 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2278424803 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2292719335 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2295442039 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2547824333 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W2592395378 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W4246725659 @default.
• W2892325610 cites W51758140 @default.
• W2892325610 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.001" @default.
• W2892325610 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8053040" @default.
• W2892325610 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30227121" @default.
• W2892325610 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2892325610 type Work @default.
• W2892325610 sameAs 2892325610 @default.
• W2892325610 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2892325610 countsByYear W28923256102020 @default.
• W2892325610 countsByYear W28923256102022 @default.
• W2892325610 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892325610 hasAuthorship W2892325610A5048364039 @default.
• W2892325610 hasAuthorship W2892325610A5048586743 @default.
• W2892325610 hasAuthorship W2892325610A5085621414 @default.
• W2892325610 hasAuthorship W2892325610A5086537473 @default.
• W2892325610 hasAuthorship W2892325610A5089799389 @default.
• W2892325610 hasBestOaLocation W28923256102 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2776172332 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2778212516 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2779755712 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C81603835 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C131872663 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C159110408 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2776172332 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2778212516 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2779076696 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2779755712 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2908647359 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C29456083 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C2986817661 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C512399662 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C71924100 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C81603835 @default.
• W2892325610 hasConceptScore W2892325610C99454951 @default.
• W2892325610 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2892325610 hasLocation W28923256101 @default.

• next