FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892433752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892433752 endingPage "720" @default.
• W2892433752 startingPage "719" @default.
• W2892433752 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 289, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialCT Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer: What Are the Gaps in Predicting Surgical Outcomes?Kathryn J. Fowler Kathryn J. Fowler Author AffiliationsFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, Room 8756, San Diego, CA 92103.Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: [email protected]).Kathryn J. Fowler Published Online:Sep 25 2018https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181912MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297(3):267–277. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304(10):1073–1081. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Hong SB, Lee SS, Kim JH, et al. Pancreatic cancer CT: prediction of resectability according to NCCN criteria. Radiology 2018;289:710–718.. Link, Google Scholar4. Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(6):1651–1660. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Ghaneh P, Kleeff J, Halloran CM, et al. The impact of positive resection margins on survival and recurrence following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017 Oct 24 [Epub ahead of print]. Google Scholar6. Verbeke CS, Smith AM. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not improved by extending resections to achieve negative margins. Ann Surg 2010;251(4):776–777; author reply 777–778. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7. Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery: the new r-status counts. Ann Surg 2017;265(3):565–573. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Number of metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211(2):196–204. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9. Tseng DS, van Santvoort HC, Fegrachi S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT in assessing extra-regional lymphadenopathy in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2014;23(4):229–235. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10. Furukawa H, Ikuma H, Asakura-Yokoe K, Uesaka K. Preoperative staging of biliary carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: prospective comparison with PET+CT, MDCT and histopathology. Eur Radiol 2008;18(12):2841–2847. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11. Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppänen MP, et al. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2009;250(6):957–963. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Aug 14 2018Accepted: Aug 17 2018Published online: Sept 25 2018Published in print: Dec 2018 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByUtility of Dark-Blood Dual-Energy CT Images for Predicting Vascular Involvement and R0 Resection in Patients With Pancreatic CancerKeKeSi, HeShuiWu, MingYang, YiWanGuo, XiaoHuiZhang, ChengYuDing, JunXue, PingHan, XinLi2023 | American Journal of RoentgenologyRole of multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of resectability of pancreatic cancerHossam Elsayed MohammedAzzaz, Mohamed ShawkyAbdullah, Rehab MohammedHabib2021 | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 1Preoperative CT Classification of the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer: Interobserver AgreementIjin Joo, Jeong Min Lee, Eun Sun Lee, Jee-Young Son, Dong Ho Lee, Su Joa Ahn, Won Chang, Sang Min Lee, Hyo-Jin Kang, Hyun Kyung Yang, 10 September 2019 | Radiology, Vol. 293, No. 2Accompanying This ArticlePancreatic Cancer CT: Prediction of Resectability according to NCCN CriteriaSep 25 2018RadiologyRecommended Articles Pancreatic Cancer CT: Prediction of Resectability according to NCCN CriteriaRadiology2018Volume: 289Issue: 3pp. 710-718Tumor-Vessel Relationships in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma at Multidetector CT: Different Classification Systems and Their Influence on Treatment PlanningRadioGraphics2016Volume: 37Issue: 1pp. 93-112Preoperative CT Classification of the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer: Interobserver AgreementRadiology2019Volume: 293Issue: 2pp. 343-349Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase II StudyRadiology2019Volume: 294Issue: 1pp. 212-220Invited Commentary on “Tumor-Vessel Relationships in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma at Multidetector CT,” with Response from Dr Zaky and ColleaguesRadioGraphics2017Volume: 37Issue: 1pp. 113-115See More RSNA Education Exhibits Focusing the Retrospectoscope: Challenging and Easily Overlooked Patterns of Recurrence and Metastases in Abdominopelvic Oncologic ImagingDigital Posters2022Pancreatic Cancer: Early Detection, Diagnosis and StagingDigital Posters2020Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic CancerDigital Posters2022 RSNA Case Collection Sister Mary Joseph NoduleRSNA Case Collection2021Inflammatory breast cancerRSNA Case Collection2020Secondary Angiosarcoma of the BreastRSNA Case Collection2021 Vol. 289, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W2892433752 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2892433752 creator A5038164406 @default.
• W2892433752 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2892433752 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2892433752 title "CT Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer: What Are the Gaps in Predicting Surgical Outcomes?" @default.
• W2892433752 cites W1968326704 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W1972313686 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2061359720 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2066185056 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2078509913 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2129197203 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2157590016 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2162918238 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2343177790 @default.
• W2892433752 cites W2893373173 @default.
• W2892433752 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181912" @default.
• W2892433752 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30251932" @default.
• W2892433752 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892433752 type Work @default.
• W2892433752 sameAs 2892433752 @default.
• W2892433752 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2892433752 countsByYear W28924337522019 @default.
• W2892433752 countsByYear W28924337522021 @default.
• W2892433752 countsByYear W28924337522023 @default.
• W2892433752 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892433752 hasAuthorship W2892433752A5038164406 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C2779804826 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C2780210213 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C2780258809 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C2780456651 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C121608353 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C126322002 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C143998085 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C168563851 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C2779804826 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C2780210213 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C2780258809 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C2780456651 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C61434518 @default.
• W2892433752 hasConceptScore W2892433752C71924100 @default.
• W2892433752 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2892433752 hasLocation W28924337521 @default.
• W2892433752 hasLocation W28924337522 @default.
• W2892433752 hasOpenAccess W2892433752 @default.
• W2892433752 hasPrimaryLocation W28924337521 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W1883975635 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W1964744725 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W1969578744 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2005537476 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2072048226 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2075181827 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2319496893 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2376347278 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2811271347 @default.
• W2892433752 hasRelatedWork W2973816194 @default.
• W2892433752 hasVolume "289" @default.
• W2892433752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892433752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892433752 magId "2892433752" @default.
• W2892433752 workType "article" @default.