FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892557553> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892557553 abstract "Design approaches for wave impact on marine structures in storm sea-states are being reconsidered due to events related to the safety of North Sea offshore structures, both fixed and floating (Valhall QP extended lifetime; COSL Innovator accident). There has been a strong research and tool development within the field during the last decade, both within model testing and numerical analysis, including CFD. However, there is still a lack of efficient methods and tools to properly analyze these phenomena and their probably of occurrence. One major aspect in this is to reduce the statistical uncertainties that are naturally arising in estimates of design loads related to extreme waves. In order to estimate the design loads it is common practice not to investigate all possible sea states (i.e. long-term analysis) but to investigate a few sea states and assume that the design value occurs at a prescribed probability level in the sea states with the same probability level (i.e. contour line approach). The estimate of the design value at that probability level is then based on results from a limited number of random realizations of these sea states. For linear or weakly nonlinear response types it is possible to estimate design loads accurately with a quite limited number of realizations. For strongly nonlinear/badly behaved problems however this is not possible due to the large variations in the tail of the distribution of the impact load, and many more realizations are required. This means that much more of these extreme, rare impact-related events should be collected to reduce the statistical uncertainty in the design load. This approach is restricted by time and costs and eventually one may have to accept an estimated design load with a large statistical uncertainty and account for the uncertainty with a higher safety margin. In this paper an improved methodology for estimating design loads related to extreme wave impacts will be presented. The methodology is based on screening many 3-hour realizations of the design sea states with simplified, fast but sufficiently accurate methods and to focus only on the potentially critical events with a model containing a more complete description of the physics. This can be either a model test or a non-linear impact simulation (i.e. CFD analysis). By doing this many more rare/critical events can be assessed, reducing the statistical uncertainty in the estimate of the design load. The main challenge is to find suitable screening methods, which may be different for different structures (fixed, floating, etc.). Several screening methods/wave impact indicators will be discussed, and their capability will be illustrated by analyzing existing model test data for fixed and floating structures, showing the correlation between indicator and actual impact events." @default.
• W2892557553 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2892557553 creator A5044081375 @default.
• W2892557553 creator A5054457400 @default.
• W2892557553 creator A5069282500 @default.
• W2892557553 creator A5071025171 @default.
• W2892557553 creator A5087128395 @default.
• W2892557553 date "2018-06-17" @default.
• W2892557553 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2892557553 title "Useful Indicators for Screening of Sea States for Wave Impacts on Fixed and Floating Platforms" @default.
• W2892557553 doi "https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2018-78544" @default.
• W2892557553 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892557553 type Work @default.
• W2892557553 sameAs 2892557553 @default.
• W2892557553 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2892557553 countsByYear W28925575532023 @default.
• W2892557553 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2892557553 hasAuthorship W2892557553A5044081375 @default.
• W2892557553 hasAuthorship W2892557553A5054457400 @default.
• W2892557553 hasAuthorship W2892557553A5069282500 @default.
• W2892557553 hasAuthorship W2892557553A5071025171 @default.
• W2892557553 hasAuthorship W2892557553A5087128395 @default.
• W2892557553 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2892557553 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2892557553 hasConceptScore W2892557553C39432304 @default.
• W2892557553 hasConceptScore W2892557553C41008148 @default.
• W2892557553 hasLocation W28925575531 @default.
• W2892557553 hasOpenAccess W2892557553 @default.
• W2892557553 hasPrimaryLocation W28925575531 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W103126966 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W117657053 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W1573901796 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2068910530 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2078705801 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2085436686 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2188821466 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2292356331 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2428948930 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2539124866 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2890775342 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2893762170 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2893918779 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2894067891 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2927717392 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W3142578971 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W606420899 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W615506259 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W616816869 @default.
• W2892557553 hasRelatedWork W2735761900 @default.
• W2892557553 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892557553 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892557553 magId "2892557553" @default.
• W2892557553 workType "article" @default.