FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892788488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892788488 endingPage "1556" @default.
• W2892788488 startingPage "1549" @default.
• W2892788488 abstract "Background: Widespread adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) systems is increasing. EMR implementation can be costly and typically requires workflow redesign. To our knowledge, no studies to date have examined the impact of EMR implementation using advanced cost accounting methods or the impact of its implementation on orthopaedic surgeons in an outpatient setting. Methods: Time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) was used to evaluate the effect of EMR implementation in an outpatient adult reconstruction clinic. One hundred and forty-three patients were prospectively timed throughout their visit to clinics, before implementation of a hospital system-wide EMR system and then again 2 months, 6 months, and 2 years after implementation. Data were analyzed to investigate the effects of EMR implementation on labor cost and provider time. Results: Total labor costs per patient visit significantly increased at 2 months after EMR implementation (from $36.88 to $46.04; p = 0.05). Drivers of this change included increases in the amount of time that attending surgeons spent per patient (from 9.38 to 10.97 minutes, with the cost increasing from $21.10 to $27.01), as well as increased time that certified medical assistants spent assessing patients (from 3.4 to 9.1 minutes; p < 0.001). Two months after EMR implementation, providers were spending more than twice as long documenting patient encounters (7.6 compared with 3.3 minutes; p < 0.001). However, by 6 months after implementation, total labor costs were similar to those before implementation ($38.75 compared with $36.88; p = 0.689) and they remained similar at 2 years after implementation ($36.88 compared with $37.73; p = 0.84). After the initial learning period following EMR implementation, providers spent more time documenting encounters (8.43 compared with 3.28 minutes; p < 0.001) but less time interacting with patients (10.03 compared with 14.65 minutes; p = 0.013). Conclusions: Using TD-ABC, we observed the EMR implementation learning period, returning to pre-introduction efficiency at 6 months. Cost increases because of increased certified medical assistant time spent with patients and physician time on documentation were offset by less patient-physician interaction. Health-care systems and policymakers should be aware that the length of the implementation period is approximately 6 months and that implementation may alter the time that providers spend with patients. Clinical Relevance: This article offers insight into the impact of EMR implementation on the orthopaedic surgeon’s clinic efficiency and workflows." @default.
• W2892788488 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5021316580 @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5038357237 @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5054986639 @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5064946210 @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5065982565 @default.
• W2892788488 creator A5075600439 @default.
• W2892788488 date "2018-09-19" @default.
• W2892788488 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2892788488 title "The Impact of Electronic Medical Record Implementation on Labor Cost and Productivity at an Outpatient Orthopaedic Clinic" @default.
• W2892788488 cites W1905967855 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W1958204979 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W1977940835 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2020225131 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2022209413 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2031627051 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2047759269 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2065125518 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2080358540 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2100711705 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2106262479 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2122645672 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2144816153 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2145011133 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2156475416 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2166931169 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2168406819 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2331417073 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2336728627 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W2515682654 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W3122717674 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W4231899502 @default.
• W2892788488 cites W938011941 @default.
• W2892788488 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01339" @default.
• W2892788488 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30234619" @default.
• W2892788488 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2892788488 type Work @default.
• W2892788488 sameAs 2892788488 @default.
• W2892788488 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2892788488 countsByYear W28927884882019 @default.
• W2892788488 countsByYear W28927884882020 @default.
• W2892788488 countsByYear W28927884882021 @default.
• W2892788488 countsByYear W28927884882022 @default.
• W2892788488 countsByYear W28927884882023 @default.
• W2892788488 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5021316580 @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5038357237 @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5054986639 @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5064946210 @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5065982565 @default.
• W2892788488 hasAuthorship W2892788488A5075600439 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C164624739 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C177212765 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C2909321700 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C3018060332 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C139719470 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C141071460 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C144133560 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C160735492 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C162324750 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C162853370 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C164624739 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C177212765 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C194828623 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C195910791 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C204983608 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C2909321700 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C3018060332 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C41008148 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C50522688 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C545542383 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C71924100 @default.
• W2892788488 hasConceptScore W2892788488C77088390 @default.
• W2892788488 hasIssue "18" @default.
• W2892788488 hasLocation W28927884881 @default.
• W2892788488 hasLocation W28927884882 @default.
• W2892788488 hasOpenAccess W2892788488 @default.
• W2892788488 hasPrimaryLocation W28927884881 @default.
• W2892788488 hasRelatedWork W128900070 @default.
• W2892788488 hasRelatedWork W1995420119 @default.
• W2892788488 hasRelatedWork W2004215924 @default.
• W2892788488 hasRelatedWork W2034489805 @default.
• W2892788488 hasRelatedWork W2105754295 @default.

• next