FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892862128> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892862128 endingPage "98.e14" @default.
• W2892862128 startingPage "98.e1" @default.
• W2892862128 abstract "BackgroundTrial of labor after cesarean delivery is an effective and safe option for women without contraindications.ObjectivesThe objective of the study was to examine hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and identify associated institutional characteristics and patient outcomes.Study DesignUsing linked maternal and newborn hospital discharge records and birth certificate data in 2010–2012 from the state of California, we identified 146,185 term singleton mothers with 1 prior cesarean delivery and no congenital anomalies or clear contraindications for trial of labor at 249 hospitals. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery were estimated for each hospital after accounting for differences in patient case mix. Risk for severe maternal and newborn morbidities, as well as maternal and newborn length of stay, were compared between hospitals with high utilization and high success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and other hospitals. Bivariate analysis was also conducted to examine the association of various institutional characteristics with hospitals’ utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery.ResultsIn the overall sample, 12.5% of women delivered vaginally. After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals, with a median of 35.2% (10th to 90th percentile range: 10.2–67.1%) and 40.5% (10th to 90th percentile range: 8.5–81.1%), respectively. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery demonstrated an inverted U-shaped relationship such that low or excessively high use of trial of labor after cesarean delivery was associated with lower success rate. Compared with other births, those delivered at hospitals with above-the-median utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery had a higher risk for uterine rupture (adjusted risk ratio, 2.74, P < .001), severe newborn respiratory complications (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46, P < .001), and severe newborn neurological complications/trauma (adjusted risk ratio, 2.48, P < .001), but they had a lower risk for severe newborn infection (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80, P = .003) and overall severe unexpected newborn complications (adjusted risk ratio, 0.86, P < .001) as well as shorter length of stays (adjusted mean ratio, 0.948 for mothers and 0.924 for newborns, P < .001 for both). Teaching status, system affiliation, larger volume, higher neonatal care capacity, anesthesia availability, higher proportion of midwife-attended births, and lower proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients were positively associated with both utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. However, rural location and higher local malpractice insurance premium were negatively associated with the utilization of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, whereas for-profit ownership was associated with lower success rate.ConclusionUtilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals. Strategies to promote vaginal birth should be tailored to hospital needs and characteristics (eg, increase availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery at hospitals with low utilization rates while being more selective at hospitals with high utilization rates, and targeted support for lower capacity hospitals). Trial of labor after cesarean delivery is an effective and safe option for women without contraindications. The objective of the study was to examine hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and identify associated institutional characteristics and patient outcomes. Using linked maternal and newborn hospital discharge records and birth certificate data in 2010–2012 from the state of California, we identified 146,185 term singleton mothers with 1 prior cesarean delivery and no congenital anomalies or clear contraindications for trial of labor at 249 hospitals. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery were estimated for each hospital after accounting for differences in patient case mix. Risk for severe maternal and newborn morbidities, as well as maternal and newborn length of stay, were compared between hospitals with high utilization and high success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery and other hospitals. Bivariate analysis was also conducted to examine the association of various institutional characteristics with hospitals’ utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. In the overall sample, 12.5% of women delivered vaginally. After adjusting for patient clinical risk factors, utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals, with a median of 35.2% (10th to 90th percentile range: 10.2–67.1%) and 40.5% (10th to 90th percentile range: 8.5–81.1%), respectively. Risk-standardized utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery demonstrated an inverted U-shaped relationship such that low or excessively high use of trial of labor after cesarean delivery was associated with lower success rate. Compared with other births, those delivered at hospitals with above-the-median utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery had a higher risk for uterine rupture (adjusted risk ratio, 2.74, P < .001), severe newborn respiratory complications (adjusted risk ratio, 1.46, P < .001), and severe newborn neurological complications/trauma (adjusted risk ratio, 2.48, P < .001), but they had a lower risk for severe newborn infection (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80, P = .003) and overall severe unexpected newborn complications (adjusted risk ratio, 0.86, P < .001) as well as shorter length of stays (adjusted mean ratio, 0.948 for mothers and 0.924 for newborns, P < .001 for both). Teaching status, system affiliation, larger volume, higher neonatal care capacity, anesthesia availability, higher proportion of midwife-attended births, and lower proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients were positively associated with both utilization and success of trial of labor after cesarean delivery. However, rural location and higher local malpractice insurance premium were negatively associated with the utilization of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, whereas for-profit ownership was associated with lower success rate. Utilization and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery varied considerably across hospitals. Strategies to promote vaginal birth should be tailored to hospital needs and characteristics (eg, increase availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery at hospitals with low utilization rates while being more selective at hospitals with high utilization rates, and targeted support for lower capacity hospitals)." @default.
• W2892862128 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5008385120 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5040445524 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5043890496 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5053008506 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5053419567 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5057033020 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5057901667 @default.
• W2892862128 creator A5087442811 @default.
• W2892862128 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2892862128 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2892862128 title "Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean" @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1970814197 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1980790591 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1987375191 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1987583783 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1989508720 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W1991364305 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2008398232 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2012805873 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2025774338 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2027820742 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2029075862 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2031684391 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2049793663 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2057529206 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2070797443 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2072200422 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2079663331 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2091126522 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2137635384 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2146446472 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2319572013 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2562893821 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2728224790 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2736640601 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2765653929 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2766158520 @default.
• W2892862128 cites W2790814755 @default.
• W2892862128 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.034" @default.
• W2892862128 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30278176" @default.
• W2892862128 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2892862128 type Work @default.
• W2892862128 sameAs 2892862128 @default.
• W2892862128 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2892862128 countsByYear W28928621282019 @default.
• W2892862128 countsByYear W28928621282020 @default.
• W2892862128 countsByYear W28928621282021 @default.
• W2892862128 countsByYear W28928621282022 @default.
• W2892862128 countsByYear W28928621282023 @default.
• W2892862128 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5008385120 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5040445524 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5043890496 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5053008506 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5053419567 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5057033020 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5057901667 @default.
• W2892862128 hasAuthorship W2892862128A5087442811 @default.
• W2892862128 hasBestOaLocation W28928621281 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConcept C2778334786 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConcept C44870925 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConceptScore W2892862128C121332964 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConceptScore W2892862128C131872663 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConceptScore W2892862128C2778334786 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConceptScore W2892862128C44870925 @default.
• W2892862128 hasConceptScore W2892862128C71924100 @default.
• W2892862128 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2892862128 hasLocation W28928621281 @default.
• W2892862128 hasLocation W28928621282 @default.
• W2892862128 hasOpenAccess W2892862128 @default.
• W2892862128 hasPrimaryLocation W28928621281 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2039318446 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2391778245 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2783428915 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2892862128 hasRelatedWork W4250651714 @default.
• W2892862128 hasVolume "220" @default.
• W2892862128 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2892862128 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2892862128 magId "2892862128" @default.
• W2892862128 workType "article" @default.