FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2892931309> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2892931309 endingPage "661" @default.
• W2892931309 startingPage "655" @default.
• W2892931309 abstract "BACKGROUND CONTEXT Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) is an increasingly common spinal disorder of which current management is characterized by a substantial variety in treatment advice. To improve evidence-based clinical decision-making and increase uniformity and transparency of care, the Scoliosis Research Society established appropriateness criteria for surgery for DLS. In these criteria, however, the patient perspective was not formally incorporated. Since patient perspective is an increasingly important consideration in informed decision-making, embedding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the appropriateness criteria would allow for an objective and transparent patient-centered approach. PURPOSE To evaluate the extent that patient perspective is integrated into the appropriateness criteria of surgery for DLS. STUDY DESIGN Single center, retrospective, cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE 150 patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Outcome Measures The association between appropriateness for surgery and various PROMs [Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Short Form 36 (SF-36), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)]. METHODS Medical records of all patients with symptomatic DLS were reviewed and scored according to the appropriateness criteria. To assess the association between the appropriateness criteria and the validated PROMs, analysis of variance was used to test for differences in PROMS for each of the three categories resulting from the appropriateness criteria. To assess how well PROMs can discriminate between appropriate and inappropriate, we used a logistic regression analysis. Discriminative ability was subsequently determined by computing the area under the curve (AUC), resulting from the logistic regression analysis. Spearman rank analysis was used to establish a correlation pattern between the PROMs used and the appropriateness criteria. RESULTS There was a significant association between the appropriateness of surgery and the PROMs. The discriminative ability for appropriateness of surgery for PROMs as a group was strong (AUC of 0.83). However, when considered in isolation, the predictive power of any individual PROMs was poor. The different categories of the appropriateness criteria significantly coincided with the PROMs used. CONCLUSION There is a statistically significant association between the appropriateness criteria of surgery for DLS and PROMs. Implementation of PROMs into the appropriateness criteria may lead to more transparent, quantifiable and uniform clinical decision making for DLS." @default.
• W2892931309 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5010231884 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5014193186 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5015788896 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5039730307 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5040398317 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5067783321 @default.
• W2892931309 creator A5087173002 @default.
• W2892931309 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2892931309 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2892931309 title "Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in appropriateness criteria of surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis" @default.
• W2892931309 cites W1966328055 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2000235333 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2004667221 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2013023534 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2021922541 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2027788451 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2032788739 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2043390017 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2050858995 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2067928666 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2120998315 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2137239902 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2286349408 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2313618881 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2583592742 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2753887864 @default.
• W2892931309 cites W2793573495 @default.
• W2892931309 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.012" @default.
• W2892931309 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30261263" @default.
• W2892931309 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2892931309 type Work @default.
• W2892931309 sameAs 2892931309 @default.
• W2892931309 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2892931309 countsByYear W28929313092020 @default.
• W2892931309 countsByYear W28929313092022 @default.
• W2892931309 countsByYear W28929313092023 @default.
• W2892931309 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5010231884 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5014193186 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5015788896 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5039730307 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5040398317 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5067783321 @default.
• W2892931309 hasAuthorship W2892931309A5087173002 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2778739829 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C111278954 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C118552586 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C126322002 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C141071460 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C14184104 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C142724271 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C151730666 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C151956035 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C159110408 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C168563851 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C1862650 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C204787440 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2775998654 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2778739829 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2779343474 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2779517570 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2779951463 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2780907711 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C2780955175 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C44575665 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C558461103 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C71924100 @default.
• W2892931309 hasConceptScore W2892931309C86803240 @default.
• W2892931309 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2892931309 hasLocation W28929313091 @default.
• W2892931309 hasLocation W28929313092 @default.
• W2892931309 hasOpenAccess W2892931309 @default.
• W2892931309 hasPrimaryLocation W28929313091 @default.
• W2892931309 hasRelatedWork W2069700831 @default.

• next