Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893074865> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2893074865 endingPage "600" @default.
- W2893074865 startingPage "590" @default.
- W2893074865 abstract "Background: Both radiofrequency and ultrasound endovascular renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) have proven clinical efficacy for the treatment of hypertension. We performed a head-to-head comparison of these technologies. Methods: Patients with resistant hypertension were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 manner to receive either treatment with (1) radiofrequency RDN of the main renal arteries; (2) radiofrequency RDN of the main renal arteries, side branches, and accessories; or (3) an endovascular ultrasound–based RDN of the main renal artery. The primary end point was change in systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure at 3 months. Results: Between June 2015 and June 2018, 120 patients were enrolled (mean age, 64±9 years±SD; mean daytime blood pressure, 153/86±12/13 mm Hg). Of these, 39 were randomly assigned to radiofrequency main renal artery ablation, 39 to combined radiofrequency ablation of the main artery and branches, and 42 to ultrasound-based treatment. Baseline daytime blood pressure, clinical characteristics, and treatment were well balanced between the groups. At 3 months, systolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure decreased by 9.5±12.3 mm Hg ( P <0.001) in the whole cohort. Although blood pressure was significantly more reduced in the ultrasound ablation group than in the radiofrequency ablation group of the main renal artery (–13.2±13.7 versus –6.5±10.3 mm Hg; mean difference, –6.7 mm Hg; global P =0.038 by ANOVA, adjusted P =0.043), no significant difference was found between the radiofrequency ablation groups (–8.3±11.7 mm Hg for additional side branch ablation; mean difference, –1.8 mm Hg; adjusted P >0.99). Similarly, the blood pressure reduction was not found to be significantly different between the ultrasound and the side branch ablation groups. Frequencies of blood pressure response ≥5 mm Hg were not significantly different (global P =0.77). Conclusions: In patients with resistant hypertension, endovascular ultrasound–based RDN was found to be superior to radiofrequency ablation of the main renal arteries only, whereas a combined approach of radiofrequency ablation of the main arteries, accessories, and side branches was not. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02920034." @default.
- W2893074865 created "2018-10-05" @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5007315811 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5026517682 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5042630628 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5049481596 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5068668471 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5068678356 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5076093741 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5079022335 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5084925061 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5087395048 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5090423896 @default.
- W2893074865 creator A5091646719 @default.
- W2893074865 date "2019-01-29" @default.
- W2893074865 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
- W2893074865 title "A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Different Renal Denervation Devices and Techniques in Patients With Resistant Hypertension (RADIOSOUND-HTN)" @default.
- W2893074865 cites W1583834060 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W1971996270 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2010972994 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2024956494 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2034643992 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2042858999 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2087484885 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2098352519 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2102794110 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2115136352 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2115461708 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2133088349 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2135446787 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2150305971 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2152487583 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2152988374 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2413833935 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2508290905 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2510584972 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2547631100 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2588117590 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2614107102 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2744633390 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2748414916 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2797345628 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2802848571 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2803910972 @default.
- W2893074865 cites W2804838656 @default.
- W2893074865 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.037654" @default.
- W2893074865 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30586691" @default.
- W2893074865 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2893074865 type Work @default.
- W2893074865 sameAs 2893074865 @default.
- W2893074865 citedByCount "118" @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652018 @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652019 @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652020 @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652021 @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652022 @default.
- W2893074865 countsByYear W28930748652023 @default.
- W2893074865 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5007315811 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5026517682 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5042630628 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5049481596 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5068668471 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5068678356 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5076093741 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5079022335 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5084925061 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5087395048 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5090423896 @default.
- W2893074865 hasAuthorship W2893074865A5091646719 @default.
- W2893074865 hasBestOaLocation W28930748651 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C149323552 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2776634560 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2776805190 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2777377203 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C2780177628 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C3019558611 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C126322002 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C126838900 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C141071460 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C143753070 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C149323552 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C164705383 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C2776634560 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C2776805190 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C2777377203 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C2778902805 @default.
- W2893074865 hasConceptScore W2893074865C2780091579 @default.