FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893129752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893129752 endingPage "1136" @default.
• W2893129752 startingPage "1136" @default.
• W2893129752 abstract "Current individualized sound therapies for tinnitus rely on tinnitus pitch assessment, which is commonly derived from the standard clinical 2-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) approach driven by the examiner. However, this method is limited by lack of individual test-retest reliability and focuses on a single rather than multiple tinnitus frequencies.To assess individual test-retest reliability of the 2-AFC, with a single final frequency (and corresponding loudness), and the tinnitus likeness rating (TLR), with the participant exposed to the entire audible frequency spectrum, from which 3 dominant frequencies and corresponding loudness were extracted.In this case series, participants with tinnitus underwent testing twice with both methods at a 1-month interval by experienced clinicians from January 6 through March 17, 2017. Each clinician tested each patient only once at visit 1 or 2 in a university audiology training setting with standardized equipment and was blind to previous assessment. Participants with bilateral or unilateral chronic tinnitus for longer than 6 months, in good health, without total deafness in either ear, and without cerumen in the ear canal were recruited through advertisements (community and clinics) and word of mouth (volunteer sample). The audiologists were likewise participants in the planned comparison between TLR and 2-AFC in the test-retest measures.Test-retest concordance with 95% CIs for each method, calculated as the proportion of participants with the same final frequency between the 2 visits (2-AFC) or with at least 1 concordant dominant frequency (TLR) as well as loudness differences of no greater than 10 dB.The study sample included 31 participants (55% men; mean [SD] age, 50.7 [13.7] years). For TLR, 26 of 31 participants had at least 1 concordant dominant frequency between the 2 visits (proportion, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), whereas for 2-AFC, 7 of 31 participants had a concordant final tinnitus pitch in either ear (proportion, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.41). Loudness reliability followed the same pattern, with more concordant loudness levels in the TLR (proportion, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88) than in the 2-AFC (proportion, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.05-0.85). Mean time taken to complete the tests was less than 15 minutes, and general appreciation by participants with tinnitus and audiologists were overall similar for both.Superior test-retest concordance can be demonstrated at the individual level using the several dominant frequencies extracted from the patient-centered TLR." @default.
• W2893129752 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893129752 creator A5088765504 @default.
• W2893129752 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2893129752 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2893129752 title "Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching" @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1599114047 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1762900036 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1888686170 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1975739865 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1979078517 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1989031872 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W1990465726 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2006058593 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2018855459 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2018989224 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2029079779 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2029426262 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2036461110 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2039033776 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2043818781 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2044766575 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2046672414 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2047318142 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2057214600 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2058077647 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2068696003 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2074357969 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2077876798 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2079910886 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2082495008 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2082512843 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2083717782 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2088811599 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2089950817 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2091649478 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2094523157 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2102185526 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2102235589 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2105216329 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2114314171 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2116439896 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2118772689 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2123371969 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2134349361 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2134597626 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2135385163 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2135640921 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2151621276 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2153681895 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2160351963 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W216660218 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2186541643 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2208494806 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2234396256 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2299391620 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2328430053 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2410688625 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2436698410 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2488707621 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2511843157 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2527826171 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2552966146 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2561824588 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2589186540 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2589607877 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2605655038 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2746525549 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2754567583 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W2756404697 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W4248190536 @default.
• W2893129752 cites W44837579 @default.
• W2893129752 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2416" @default.
• W2893129752 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6583084" @default.
• W2893129752 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30267085" @default.
• W2893129752 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2893129752 type Work @default.
• W2893129752 sameAs 2893129752 @default.
• W2893129752 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2893129752 countsByYear W28931297522019 @default.
• W2893129752 countsByYear W28931297522020 @default.
• W2893129752 countsByYear W28931297522021 @default.
• W2893129752 countsByYear W28931297522022 @default.
• W2893129752 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893129752 hasAuthorship W2893129752A5088765504 @default.
• W2893129752 hasBestOaLocation W28931297521 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C2776992516 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2893129752 hasConcept C62520636 @default.

• next