FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893274621> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893274621 endingPage "725" @default.
• W2893274621 startingPage "721" @default.
• W2893274621 abstract "Renewing Inequality and Mapping Inequality Jason A. Heppler (bio) Digital Scholarship Lab, Renewing Inequality: Family Displacements through Urban Renewal and Mapping Inequality: Redlining in New Deal America, American Panorama, ed. Robert K. Nelson and Edward L. Ayers, University of Richmond, 2016-18. dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/ (accessed 01 2018). Two decades of historical scholarship have deftly examined the racial underpinnings of urban history, exploring how residential segregation was constructed around federal policies and funding purported to support cities. But two digital projects, Mapping Inequality and Renewing Inequality, add another important and stunning way to understand these policies: through their visualization in time and place. Together they provide an excellent overview of urban federal policies and their impact on American families between 1930 and 1970. While the histories of these policies are well covered among urban historians, the two projects helpfully combine a broad overview of these policies and their implementation's effect and provide an ease of moving among scales that allow researchers, students, and teachers to fully engage with the historical argument and material. The two projects are part of the broader initiative American Panorama, a digital atlas of American history emerging out of the partnership of the University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab and San Francisco's Stamen Design. American Panorama is edited by the historians Robert Nelson and Edward Ayers, and funded through the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the University of Richmond. These two projects are the most ambitious among the seven that American Panorama has created. Mapping Inequality seeks to examine how the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) underwrote residential segregation through its urban development programs. The project offers several ways to explore wealth disparity in New Deal America, from the 150 redlining maps to curated and digitized area descriptions to visualizing how inequality was placed. [End Page 721] Users coming to Mapping Inequality for the first time are presented with a list of states and their respective cities positioned along the right side of the screen, with a nation-wide map of all HOLC cities taking up the remaining two-thirds of the screen. The list of cities helpfully provides a horizontal bar chart of HOLC's neighborhood ratings (A through D) to visualize the number of neighborhood grades per city. Selecting any one of these cities, either from the list or on the map, zooms the reader to the city-level. Here users can compare 1930 and 1940 Census figures in cases where those data are available (total population, foreign-born white, native-born white, African American, and Asian American). Zooming to a particular city overlays a high-resolution, georectified HOLC map on top of a present-day basemap. Clickable polygons are drawn on top of the neighborhood areas, allowing readers to interact with a particular neighborhood and read the area descriptions—the primary source neighborhood reports created by the HOLC surveyors. The project also dispels the concentric-circle pattern of urban development first posited by the sociologist Ernest W. Burgess in 1925 by visualizing the distribution of HOLC ratings. Replicating the concentric circles as an interactive visualization, users can mouse over each concentric section to see the HOLC grading breakdown; hovering over a grade highlights the corresponding neighborhood areas on the map. The concentric circle visualization, then, doubles as a donut chart to illustrate the grade breakdown of cities as it radiates out from the urban core. The point is not to reify the ideas of Burgess but to illustrate, concretely, that his theory does not hold up to reality. Renewing Inequality picks up where Mapping Inequality leaves off by exploring the urban renewal policies of the post–World War II era. The project explores how funding provided by the federal government to raze blighted urban areas displaced families from their homes, often disproportionately affecting families of color. Like Mapping Inequality, Renewing Inequality provides several avenues for exploring the historical processes at work: by indicating, through circle diameter, the number of families displaced (shaded in color depending on whether the majority are families of color or white families); providing project boundaries and type, poverty and racial data, and the number of families displaced by year; and offering specifics about project type..." @default.
• W2893274621 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893274621 creator A5024048560 @default.
• W2893274621 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2893274621 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2893274621 title "Renewing Inequality and Mapping Inequality" @default.
• W2893274621 cites W1119569401 @default.
• W2893274621 cites W1603064272 @default.
• W2893274621 cites W3147577461 @default.
• W2893274621 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2018.0058" @default.
• W2893274621 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2893274621 type Work @default.
• W2893274621 sameAs 2893274621 @default.
• W2893274621 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2893274621 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893274621 hasAuthorship W2893274621A5024048560 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C2780580889 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C45555294 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C134306372 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C142362112 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C144024400 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C153349607 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C17744445 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C185592680 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C199539241 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C2778061430 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C2780580889 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C3116431 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C33923547 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C45555294 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C55493867 @default.
• W2893274621 hasConceptScore W2893274621C98184364 @default.
• W2893274621 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2893274621 hasLocation W28932746211 @default.
• W2893274621 hasOpenAccess W2893274621 @default.
• W2893274621 hasPrimaryLocation W28932746211 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W1524263338 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W2365263981 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W2789335203 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W3033688738 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W3123410314 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W3134382238 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W3216603849 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W4311871569 @default.
• W2893274621 hasRelatedWork W4367019052 @default.
• W2893274621 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2893274621 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2893274621 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2893274621 magId "2893274621" @default.
• W2893274621 workType "article" @default.