FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893295018> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893295018 abstract "Improving movement control can be an important treatment goal for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Although external feedback is essential when learning new movement skills, many aspects of feedback provision in patients with CLBP remain currently unexplored. New rehabilitation technologies, such as movement sensors, are able to provide reliable and accurate feedback. As such, they might be more effective than conventional feedback for improving movement control. The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether sensor-based feedback is more effective to improve lumbopelvic movement control compared to feedback from a mirror or no feedback in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and (2) to evaluate whether patients with CLBP are equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. Fifty-four healthy participants and 54 patients with chronic non-specific LBP were recruited. Both participant groups were randomised into three subgroups. During a single exercise session, subgroups practised a lumbopelvic movement control task while receiving a different type of feedback, i.e. feedback from movement sensors, from a mirror or no feedback (=control group). Kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine and hip were obtained at baseline, during and immediately after the intervention to evaluate the improvements in movement control on the practised task (assessment of performance) and on a transfer task (assessment of motor learning). Sensor-based feedback was more effective than feedback from a mirror (p < 0.0001) and no feedback (p < 0.0001) to improve lumbopelvic movement control performance (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 9.9° (95% CI 6.1°-13.7°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 10.6° (95% CI 6.8°-14.3°)) and motor learning (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 7.2° (95% CI 3.8°-10.6°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 6.9° (95% CI 3.5°-10.2°)). Patients with CLBP were equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. Sensor-based feedback is an effective means to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with CLBP. Future research should focus on the long-term retention effects of sensor-based feedback. clinicaltrials.gov NCT02773160 , (retrospectively registered on May 16th, 2016)." @default.
• W2893295018 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893295018 creator A5005706359 @default.
• W2893295018 creator A5071238683 @default.
• W2893295018 creator A5084648937 @default.
• W2893295018 creator A5091005154 @default.
• W2893295018 date "2018-09-26" @default.
• W2893295018 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2893295018 title "Sensor-based postural feedback is more effective than conventional feedback to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial" @default.
• W2893295018 cites W1969646198 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W1996124898 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W1997902634 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W1999620930 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2004008756 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2031465808 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2038078069 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2040621740 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2048750388 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2058543238 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2068728849 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2071739653 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2074297243 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2096958731 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2102372320 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2108014670 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2118516436 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2120795002 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2125208830 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2162764535 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2164068562 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2316009072 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2410433839 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2432995450 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2492098755 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2591746674 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2745694237 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2788914217 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2794591350 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2799625533 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W2800530738 @default.
• W2893295018 cites W99356079 @default.
• W2893295018 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0423-6" @default.
• W2893295018 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6156867" @default.
• W2893295018 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30253807" @default.
• W2893295018 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2893295018 type Work @default.
• W2893295018 sameAs 2893295018 @default.
• W2893295018 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2893295018 countsByYear W28932950182019 @default.
• W2893295018 countsByYear W28932950182020 @default.
• W2893295018 countsByYear W28932950182021 @default.
• W2893295018 countsByYear W28932950182022 @default.
• W2893295018 countsByYear W28932950182023 @default.
• W2893295018 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893295018 hasAuthorship W2893295018A5005706359 @default.
• W2893295018 hasAuthorship W2893295018A5071238683 @default.
• W2893295018 hasAuthorship W2893295018A5084648937 @default.
• W2893295018 hasAuthorship W2893295018A5091005154 @default.
• W2893295018 hasBestOaLocation W28932950181 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C107690735 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C137813230 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C2779470654 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C2780226923 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C39920418 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C64635419 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C107038049 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C107690735 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C118552586 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C121332964 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C137813230 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C138885662 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C141071460 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C142724271 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C15744967 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C162324750 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C168563851 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C169760540 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C1862650 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C187736073 @default.
• W2893295018 hasConceptScore W2893295018C204787440 @default.

• next