FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893677485> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893677485 endingPage "48" @default.
• W2893677485 startingPage "41" @default.
• W2893677485 abstract "This study sought to evaluate the associations between background exposures and psychological determinants, among postpartum Jewish and Arab women, relative to actual prenatal test endorsement. The independent and aggregative effects of contextual features and the subjective opinions and attitudes relative to a prenatal testing were evaluated, using logistic regressions. After accounting for contextual features, Jews with positive vs. negative opinions on screening were significantly more likely to undergo a prenatal screening. Specifically, having more favourable ideas on pregnancy termination, among Jews, was associated with a greater likelihood of triple test, nuchal translucency and ultrasound uptake as compared with those that refused. Similarly, Arabs who were more inclined to abort the pregnancy had a greater chance of using nuchal translucency and ultrasound vs. those that declined testing. As the preferences for prenatal test outcomes are multifaceted and vary according to population group, a better understanding of the factors involved in making testing choices could help ease the decision-making process.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The choice to undergo prenatal screening tests is influenced by various determinants, which include: social, demographic and emotional factors that vary by cultural preferences. Indeed, women integrate (subjective) beliefs and values that extend beyond rational (objective) reasoning when estimating whether or not to undergo testing. It may then be that, prenatal test choices might be, influenced less by actual risk status and more so by emotional factors. And while, the latter are more likely to be amendable, and thus influence changes in perception, the effect of psychological exposures on the decision making process in the genetic testing context, especially among Israeli Jews and Arabs, has been understudied.What the results of this study add? The current study extends the focus by addressing the role of evaluative beliefs and emotional factors involved with formulating prenatal screening judgments relative to actual testing among individuals with diverse profiles (Israeli Jews and Arabs). What was clarified was that background factors and psychological perceptions, such as having supportive attitudes on screening and a willingness to undergo abortion were, for the most part, related to prenatal test uptake. Concomitantly, these involve dense decision-making practices that can be difficult to approximate, as cultural settings and individual preferences often have an impact on intention-to-test.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Culturally appropriate counselling that would account for personal preferences alongside actual risk appraisals could enable pregnant women to make informed and autonomous prenatal testing choices. The integration of socio-demographics, psychological correlates and other contextual factors into a theoretical framework, studied uniquely by sub-populations, could enrich future research. Such research can, in turn, provide a clearer picture of the social need for genetic counselling, help customise local interventions, and on a broader scale inform national policy." @default.
• W2893677485 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893677485 creator A5000656400 @default.
• W2893677485 creator A5018623528 @default.
• W2893677485 creator A5019568304 @default.
• W2893677485 creator A5027512143 @default.
• W2893677485 date "2018-09-22" @default.
• W2893677485 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2893677485 title "Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study" @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1492557989 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1586727804 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1594562614 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1840430416 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1968049222 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1983915042 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1990124938 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1996467925 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1996609874 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W1997785840 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2003910977 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2007757072 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2021608663 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2054083253 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2058397996 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2087030794 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2099717454 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2134740567 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2152095411 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2154348306 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W2163826599 @default.
• W2893677485 cites W3122968660 @default.
• W2893677485 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1463977" @default.
• W2893677485 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30244627" @default.
• W2893677485 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2893677485 type Work @default.
• W2893677485 sameAs 2893677485 @default.
• W2893677485 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2893677485 countsByYear W28936774852020 @default.
• W2893677485 countsByYear W28936774852021 @default.
• W2893677485 countsByYear W28936774852022 @default.
• W2893677485 countsByYear W28936774852023 @default.
• W2893677485 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893677485 hasAuthorship W2893677485A5000656400 @default.
• W2893677485 hasAuthorship W2893677485A5018623528 @default.
• W2893677485 hasAuthorship W2893677485A5019568304 @default.
• W2893677485 hasAuthorship W2893677485A5027512143 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C126322002 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C144024400 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C149923435 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C151730666 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C151956035 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C2777267654 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C2779234561 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C2908647359 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C54355233 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C70410870 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C71924100 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C86803240 @default.
• W2893677485 hasConceptScore W2893677485C99454951 @default.
• W2893677485 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2893677485 hasLocation W28936774851 @default.
• W2893677485 hasLocation W28936774852 @default.
• W2893677485 hasOpenAccess W2893677485 @default.
• W2893677485 hasPrimaryLocation W28936774851 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W176568282 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W1980296778 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W1998705666 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2159543396 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2289483373 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2348246626 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2363400180 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2373535963 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W2389709268 @default.
• W2893677485 hasRelatedWork W4302333749 @default.
• W2893677485 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W2893677485 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2893677485 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2893677485 magId "2893677485" @default.
• W2893677485 workType "article" @default.