FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893809886> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893809886 endingPage "1635" @default.
• W2893809886 startingPage "1628" @default.
• W2893809886 abstract "Purpose Although the minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is a major criterion for the diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome (SS), multiple studies have outlined difficulties in standardization. The purpose of this study was to answer the following question: in all patients referred for MSGB, did strict application of focus scoring criteria alter the sensitivity of and predictive value of the MSGB in the diagnosis of SS compared with the initial interpretation? Materials and Methods The authors designed a cross-sectional study of patients referred to the Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Boston, MA) over a 5-year period for MSGB. The primary predictor variable was the MSGB focus score. The primary outcome variable was the SS diagnosis. The newly established SS diagnosis status results were compared with the initial SS diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Other relevant variables of interest, such as size of glandular tissue harvested and associated signs and symptoms, also were documented. The primary predictor variable was the MSGB focus score and the primary outcome variable was the SS diagnosis (positive or negative). Results Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 48.5 years (range, 19 to 71 yr) and 64 were women (87.6%). The authors' previous study using initial pathology reports yielded 80.0% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 57.1% PPV, and 95.5% NPV. The present review of the MSGB using strict focus scoring guidelines yielded 95.4% sensitivity, 76.4% specificity, 63.6% PPV, and 97.5% NPV. Conclusions The MSGB is an important major criterion in establishing a diagnosis of SS. Application of strict focus scoring guidelines when reviewing the MSGB yielded a sensitivity far greater than initially reported in this group. Difficulties with interpretation are discussed. Future studies will focus on improvement of interpretation and immunohistochemical aids in diagnosis. Although the minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is a major criterion for the diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome (SS), multiple studies have outlined difficulties in standardization. The purpose of this study was to answer the following question: in all patients referred for MSGB, did strict application of focus scoring criteria alter the sensitivity of and predictive value of the MSGB in the diagnosis of SS compared with the initial interpretation? The authors designed a cross-sectional study of patients referred to the Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Boston, MA) over a 5-year period for MSGB. The primary predictor variable was the MSGB focus score. The primary outcome variable was the SS diagnosis. The newly established SS diagnosis status results were compared with the initial SS diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Other relevant variables of interest, such as size of glandular tissue harvested and associated signs and symptoms, also were documented. The primary predictor variable was the MSGB focus score and the primary outcome variable was the SS diagnosis (positive or negative). Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 48.5 years (range, 19 to 71 yr) and 64 were women (87.6%). The authors' previous study using initial pathology reports yielded 80.0% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 57.1% PPV, and 95.5% NPV. The present review of the MSGB using strict focus scoring guidelines yielded 95.4% sensitivity, 76.4% specificity, 63.6% PPV, and 97.5% NPV. The MSGB is an important major criterion in establishing a diagnosis of SS. Application of strict focus scoring guidelines when reviewing the MSGB yielded a sensitivity far greater than initially reported in this group. Difficulties with interpretation are discussed. Future studies will focus on improvement of interpretation and immunohistochemical aids in diagnosis." @default.
• W2893809886 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893809886 creator A5001576547 @default.
• W2893809886 creator A5012096829 @default.
• W2893809886 creator A5058601321 @default.
• W2893809886 creator A5083332181 @default.
• W2893809886 date "2019-08-01" @default.
• W2893809886 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2893809886 title "Discrepancies in Interpretation of the Minor Salivary Gland Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Sjögren Syndrome" @default.
• W2893809886 cites W112689046 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2009603759 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2024308747 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2024334721 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2044570210 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2084258547 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2108446675 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2127675578 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2133035735 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2135808122 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2151648335 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2307620916 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2342074079 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2564743788 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2594474219 @default.
• W2893809886 cites W2619369174 @default.
• W2893809886 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.052" @default.
• W2893809886 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30836075" @default.
• W2893809886 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2893809886 type Work @default.
• W2893809886 sameAs 2893809886 @default.
• W2893809886 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2893809886 countsByYear W28938098862019 @default.
• W2893809886 countsByYear W28938098862020 @default.
• W2893809886 countsByYear W28938098862021 @default.
• W2893809886 countsByYear W28938098862022 @default.
• W2893809886 countsByYear W28938098862023 @default.
• W2893809886 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893809886 hasAuthorship W2893809886A5001576547 @default.
• W2893809886 hasAuthorship W2893809886A5012096829 @default.
• W2893809886 hasAuthorship W2893809886A5058601321 @default.
• W2893809886 hasAuthorship W2893809886A5083332181 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C3019719930 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C126322002 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C142724271 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C2775934546 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C3019719930 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C534262118 @default.
• W2893809886 hasConceptScore W2893809886C71924100 @default.
• W2893809886 hasFunder F4320308349 @default.
• W2893809886 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2893809886 hasLocation W28938098861 @default.
• W2893809886 hasLocation W28938098862 @default.
• W2893809886 hasOpenAccess W2893809886 @default.
• W2893809886 hasPrimaryLocation W28938098861 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W1246532180 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W1979304780 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2012383747 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2043429399 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2104555026 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2327532855 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2417959879 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W2418373287 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W29192503 @default.
• W2893809886 hasRelatedWork W4377092993 @default.
• W2893809886 hasVolume "77" @default.
• W2893809886 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2893809886 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2893809886 magId "2893809886" @default.
• W2893809886 workType "article" @default.