FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2893867795> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2893867795 endingPage "179" @default.
• W2893867795 startingPage "177" @default.
• W2893867795 abstract "Future NeurologyVol. 13, No. 4 EditorialDementia screening: a different proposalAJ LarnerAJ Larner*Author for correspondence: Tel.: +44 151 529 8119; Fax: +44 151 529 8552; E-mail Address: a.larner@thewaltoncentre.nhs.uk Cognitive Function Clinic, Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, UKSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:27 Sep 2018https://doi.org/10.2217/fnl-2018-0018AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleKeywords: dementiadiagnosismetamemoryscreeningSMC Likert scaleReferences1 Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Public Health Paper No. 34. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland (1968).Google Scholar2 Price HL, Larner AJ. Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment: a case for screening? Prog. Neurol. Psychiatry 17(5), 6–7 (2013).Crossref, Google Scholar3 Mitchell AJ, Beaumont H, Ferguson D, Yadegarfar M, Stubbs B. Risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older people with subjective memory complaints: meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 130(6), 439–451 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4 Garcia-Ptacek S, Eriksdotter M, Jelic V, Porta-Etessam J, Kareholt I, Manzano Palomo S. Subjective cognitive impairment: towards early identification of Alzheimer disease. Neurologia 31(8), 562–571 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5 Department of Health. Living Well with Dementia: a National Dementia Strategy. Department of Health, London, UK (2009).Google Scholar6 Department of Health. Prime Minister's Challenge on Dementia. Delivering Major Improvements in Dementia Care and Research by 2015. Department of Health, London, UK (2012).Google Scholar7 Department of Health. Prime Minister's Challenge on Dementia 2020. Department of Health, London, UK (2015).Google Scholar8 Larner AJ. Dementia in Clinical Practice: a Neurological Perspective. Pragmatic Studies in the Cognitive Function Clinic. Springer, London, UK, 1–21 (2018).Crossref, Google Scholar9 Bharambe V, Larner AJ. Functional cognitive disorders: memory clinic study. Prog. Neurol. Psychiatry 22(3), (2018) (In Press).Crossref, Google Scholar10 Stone J, Pal S, Blackburn D, Reuber M, Thekkumpurath P, Carson A. Functional (psychogenic) cognitive disorders: a perspective from the neurology clinic. J. Alzheimers Dis. 48(Suppl. 1), S5–S17 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Paradise MB, Glozier NS, Naismith SL, Davenport TA, Hickie IB. Subjective memory complaints, vascular risk factors and psychological distress in the middle-aged: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 11, 108 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 O'Caoimh R, Timmons S, Molloy DW. Screening for mild cognitive impairment: comparison of ‘MCI specific’ screening instruments. J. Alzheimers Dis. 51(2), 619–629 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Aji BM, Larner AJ. Screening for dementia: single yes/no question or Likert scale? Clin. Med. 17(1), 93–94 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Larner AJ. Metamemory: a construct with diagnostic utility in a cognitive disorders clinic? Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 33(3), 553–554 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar15 Bharambe V, Larner AJ. Functional cognitive disorders: demographic and clinical features contribute to a positive diagnosis. Submitted (2018).Link, Google Scholar16 Dixon RA, Hultsch DF, Hertzog C. The Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 24(4), 671–688 (1988). Erratum in: Psychopharmacol. Bull. 25(2), 157 (1989).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar17 Fleming SM, Frith CD (Eds). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Springer, London, UK (2014).Crossref, Google Scholar18 Hsieh S, McGrory S, Leslie F et al. The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination: a new assessment tool for dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 39(1–2), 1–11 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Flicker L, Logiudice D, Carlin JB, Ames D. The predictive value of dementia screening instruments in clinical populations. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 12(2), 203–209 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar20 Mackinnon A, Mulligan R. Combining cognitive testing and informant report to increase accuracy in screening for dementia. Am. J. Psychiatry 155(11), 1529–1535 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByFunctional cognitive disorder affects reaction time, subjective mental effort and global metacognition6 October 2022 | Brain, Vol. 7The frequency and framing of cognitive lapses in healthy adults22 January 2021 | CNS Spectrums, Vol. 27, No. 3Metacognition in functional cognitive disorder: contradictory or convergent experimental results?27 May 2022 | Brain Communications, Vol. 4, No. 3Identifying functional cognitive disorder: a proposed diagnostic risk model17 September 2021 | CNS SpectrumsFunctional Cognitive Disorders (FCD): How Is Metacognition Involved?18 August 2021 | Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 8Other Measures, Other Tables1 January 2022Functional cognitive disorders: update on diagnostic statusAJ Larner30 April 2020 | Neurodegenerative Disease Management, Vol. 10, No. 2Functional cognitive disorders: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Psychiatry, Vol. 7, No. 2Introduction2 April 2020Combining Screeners (2): Other Combinations2 April 2020Single-Item Cognitive Screening Questions2 April 2020Metacognition in functional cognitive disorder- a potential mechanism and treatment target7 August 2019 | Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 24, No. 5Clinical presentation and neuropsychological profiles of Functional Cognitive Disorder patients with and without co-morbid depression11 March 2019 | Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 24, No. 2Introduction4 July 2019Future Prospects for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies in Dementia4 July 2019Functional cognitive disorders: demographic and clinical features contribute to a positive diagnosisViraj Bharambe & Andrew J Larner19 November 2018 | Neurodegenerative Disease Management, Vol. 8, No. 6 Vol. 13, No. 4 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 63 times History Received 7 June 2018 Accepted 31 July 2018 Published online 27 September 2018 Published in print November 2018 Information© 2018 Future Medicine LtdKeywordsdementiadiagnosismetamemoryscreeningSMC Likert scaleFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download" @default.
• W2893867795 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2893867795 creator A5049131088 @default.
• W2893867795 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2893867795 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2893867795 title "Dementia screening: a different proposal" @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2003950361 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2040791183 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2058173549 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2060506489 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2060642015 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2067261486 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2164506680 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2168264191 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2260435978 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2585084161 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2794028804 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2888435143 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W2900663178 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W4251900918 @default.
• W2893867795 cites W578139102 @default.
• W2893867795 doi "https://doi.org/10.2217/fnl-2018-0018" @default.
• W2893867795 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2893867795 type Work @default.
• W2893867795 sameAs 2893867795 @default.
• W2893867795 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2893867795 countsByYear W28938677952018 @default.
• W2893867795 countsByYear W28938677952019 @default.
• W2893867795 countsByYear W28938677952020 @default.
• W2893867795 countsByYear W28938677952021 @default.
• W2893867795 countsByYear W28938677952022 @default.
• W2893867795 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2893867795 hasAuthorship W2893867795A5049131088 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C2984915365 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C118552586 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C126322002 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C169900460 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C2779134260 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C2779483572 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C2984915365 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C512399662 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C71924100 @default.
• W2893867795 hasConceptScore W2893867795C74909509 @default.
• W2893867795 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2893867795 hasLocation W28938677951 @default.
• W2893867795 hasOpenAccess W2893867795 @default.
• W2893867795 hasPrimaryLocation W28938677951 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2002292936 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2090073970 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2126124642 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2193161925 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2654045315 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2899390696 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W2965059329 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W4251406868 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W4254094681 @default.
• W2893867795 hasRelatedWork W4312389194 @default.
• W2893867795 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2893867795 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2893867795 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2893867795 magId "2893867795" @default.
• W2893867795 workType "article" @default.