FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894041793> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894041793 endingPage "286" @default.
• W2894041793 startingPage "249" @default.
• W2894041793 abstract "We know very little about the people and institutions that make up the bulk of the United States civil justice system: state judges and state courts. Our understanding of civil justice is based primarily on federal litigation and the decisions of appellate judges. Staggeringly little legal scholarship focuses on state courts and judges. We simply do not know what most judges are doing in their day-to-day courtroom roles or in their roles as institutional actors and managers of civil justice infrastructure. We know little about the factors that shape and influence judicial practices, let alone the consequences of those practices for courts, litigants, and the public. From top to bottom, we can describe and theorize about our existing civil justice system in only piecemeal ways. Given legal scholarship's near-complete focus on federal civil courts, the stories we tell about the civil justice system may be based on assumptions and models that only apply in the rarefied world of federal court. Meanwhile, state judges and courts--which handle ninety-nine percent of all civil cases--are ripe for theoretical and empirical exploration. In response, we call for more research aimed at increasing our understanding of state civil courts and judges and offer a theoretical framework to support this work, one that reflects how state courts differ from federal courts. This framework is grounded in a core fact of American civil justice, one both easily observed and largely overlooked: the majority of parties in state civil courts are unrepresented. Given this new pro se reality, our theoretical framework identifies four novel assumptions to guide future research: (1) the adversary process is disappearing; (2) most state court business is still conducted through in-person interactions between judges and parties; (3) the judicial role is ethically ambiguous in pro se cases; and (4) a largely static body of written law has not kept pace with the evolving and dynamic issues facing state courts. Building on the growth of empiricism and empirically grounded theory in traditional legal scholarship and access to justice research, we call on scholars to develop theory and gather data to map the new reality of civil justice and judging in America, and suggest questions to guide future research." @default.
• W2894041793 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2894041793 creator A5028154510 @default.
• W2894041793 creator A5034237106 @default.
• W2894041793 creator A5046881658 @default.
• W2894041793 creator A5081945889 @default.
• W2894041793 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2894041793 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2894041793 title "Studying the New Civil Judges" @default.
• W2894041793 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894041793 type Work @default.
• W2894041793 sameAs 2894041793 @default.
• W2894041793 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2894041793 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894041793 hasAuthorship W2894041793A5028154510 @default.
• W2894041793 hasAuthorship W2894041793A5034237106 @default.
• W2894041793 hasAuthorship W2894041793A5046881658 @default.
• W2894041793 hasAuthorship W2894041793A5081945889 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C2780858371 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C2991881936 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C11413529 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C139621336 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C17744445 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C199539241 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C2778061430 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C2780858371 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C2991881936 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C41008148 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C48103436 @default.
• W2894041793 hasConceptScore W2894041793C538833194 @default.
• W2894041793 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2894041793 hasLocation W28940417931 @default.
• W2894041793 hasOpenAccess W2894041793 @default.
• W2894041793 hasPrimaryLocation W28940417931 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W1491721458 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W1535626170 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W1597697514 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W1607038526 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2273831016 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2317153544 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2347054451 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2564581821 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W269303753 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2786956378 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W2921145046 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3011763131 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3031891677 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3037819896 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3122178504 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3122381962 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3125982884 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3133855034 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W3153380139 @default.
• W2894041793 hasRelatedWork W645438054 @default.
• W2894041793 hasVolume "2018" @default.
• W2894041793 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894041793 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894041793 magId "2894041793" @default.
• W2894041793 workType "article" @default.