FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2894280510> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2894280510 abstract "INTRODUCTION:In the modern medical era, laparoscopic approach to surgical conditions have reached to a height that it is performed even for malignant conditions. The Minimal access Surgery which has grown up from minimally invasive surgery has given us the faith that nearly all surgeries can be done by laparoscopy.The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done by Prof. Dr.Med Erich Muhe of Germany in the year 1985. He has been awarded the German surgical society anniversary award in the year 1992. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed by two different techniques,(A) The DA VINCI system,(B) The BONATI system.About ten lakh cholecystectomies are performed ever year, of which 96% are done by laparoscopic method. laparascopic cholecystectomy is the most common laparoscopic procedure that is done today in the modern medical era.By number of studies and research works, it is stated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to conventional open method because of its advantages like smaller incisions, early recovery, less post operative pain and hospital stay, better cosmesis. However laparoscopic cholecystectomy also has got its own disadvantages and complications.In 1992, a NIH consensus conference held in Bethesda approved laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.Conversion to open technique is a major morbidity of laparoscopy as it looses its supremacy over open technique once the conversion takes place.With growing experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and completion of the learning curve, the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been extended approaching that of opaen cholecystectomy.Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have beenminimized to as low as 2-6%.3 However, a substantial proportion of patients had to be converted to open operation because of technical difficulties or intraoperative complication. Conversion rates of 2.6% to 14% had been described in different studies. The factor to be considered with conversion is that it should never be considered a complication, but rather a correct judgement by the surgeon.AIM OF THE STUDY:The aim of the present study is1. To study the incidence of conversion of laparoscopicCholecystectomy.2. To analyse the reasons for the conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy owing to per operative complications like,a. Arterial injury,b. Hepato biliary tract injury,c. Dense adhesions,d. Aberrant anatomy,e. Technical issues.MATERIALS AND METHODS:The study was conducted in the patients who underwentlaparoscopic cholecystectomy from November 2011 to November 2012 in the department of general surgery, Government Stanley Hospital. There were totally 100 patients of which are males and are females. The study has been done after the patients informed consent.All these patients were evaluated in a proper manner as given in the proforma and have been assessed pre operatively and operated under perfect anaesthetic fitness.This study mainly focusses on the patients who have beenconverted to open method. They were analysed further regarding the reasons for conversion to open method due to per-operative complications.INCLUSION CRITERIA:i. All patients with syptomatic gallstone diseaseii. Asymptomatic gallstone disease in patients with type 2 DM.iii. Benign gall bladder disease like gallbladder polyp EXCLUSION CRITERIA:i. Patients who had undergone previous upper GI surgeriesii. Patients with known liver diseasesMETHODOLOGY :• All patients admitted in SMC-GS ward with a diagnosis of cholelithiasis in the time period of November 2011 – November 2012 are included in this study. Thorough history and clinical examination was done.• Admission baseline blood investigations was done. Liverfunction test was done in all patients.• As per the standard protocol all patients were treated with medical and surgical care as available in institution. All patients were subjected to ultrasonogram abdomen and upper GI endoscopy.• CECT abdomen was done in patients with suspectedpancreatic/common bile duct pathology.• MRCP was done in patients with elevated alkaline phosphatase and dilated CBD/associated CBD pathology.• Consent regarding conversion if necessary was also obtained in all cases.OBSERVATION AND RESULTS:From November 2011 – November 2012, a total of 98 patients had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Hospital.Out of 98 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy 13 patients (13.26 %) were converted to open cholecystectomy owing to per-operative complications. The reasons for conversions are listed in the (Table 1and Chart 1).Of these 98 patients 36 were males and 62 were females, out of which 6 males and 7 females were converted into open cholecystectomy i.e., 6.12% males and 7.14% females of total cases. when taken in terms of number of males and females who got converted male and femalepercentage were 16.66% and 11.29% (Table 2 and Chart 2).respectively. The least age patient in our study is 16 and the highest age patient is 70. The conversion was higher in 40-50 age group (46.15% of total conversion) and was low in 30-40 age group (15.38% of totalconversion) patients. Conversion was not done in 10-20 age group and 60-70 age group patients. highest number of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were in 30-40 age group. (Table 3 and Chart 3).All patients underwent cholecystectomy as an elective case.Though some morbidity was there in terms of post operative complications which we are not analyzing , no mortality was reported.CONCLUSION:After analyzing the results of our study,• We conclude that the incidence of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 13.26 %.• The reasons for conversion in descending order of frequency are:1. Dense adhesions (5.1%),2. Difficult anatomy around calot’s triangle (3.06 %),3. Arterial injury (3.06 %),4. Hepato-biliary injury (1.02 %),5. Technical issues (1.02 %)." @default.
• W2894280510 created "2018-10-05" @default.
• W2894280510 creator A5016821810 @default.
• W2894280510 creator A5064991186 @default.
• W2894280510 date "2018-09-17" @default.
• W2894280510 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2894280510 title "STUDY ON THE CONVERSION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY OWING TO PER OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS" @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2027031773 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2033905825 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2038760473 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2039820559 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2097059400 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2100638731 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2107348124 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2116740469 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2117327649 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2128313233 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2138007388 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2146644274 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2161919051 @default.
• W2894280510 cites W2757966132 @default.
• W2894280510 doi "https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2018/929" @default.
• W2894280510 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2894280510 type Work @default.
• W2894280510 sameAs 2894280510 @default.
• W2894280510 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2894280510 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2894280510 hasAuthorship W2894280510A5016821810 @default.
• W2894280510 hasAuthorship W2894280510A5064991186 @default.
• W2894280510 hasBestOaLocation W28942805101 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C2987287001 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C141071460 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C2776641081 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C2780047204 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C2780943399 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C2987287001 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C61434518 @default.
• W2894280510 hasConceptScore W2894280510C71924100 @default.
• W2894280510 hasLocation W28942805101 @default.
• W2894280510 hasOpenAccess W2894280510 @default.
• W2894280510 hasPrimaryLocation W28942805101 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W1516347236 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W1571959223 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W1996381166 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W2038037043 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W2038171782 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W2352759876 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W27723179 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W2894280510 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W3092372764 @default.
• W2894280510 hasRelatedWork W2513395332 @default.
• W2894280510 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2894280510 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2894280510 magId "2894280510" @default.
• W2894280510 workType "article" @default.